security-audit

A command for reviewing code for common security weaknesses using the OWASP Top 10, a widely used list of web application risks. It can review specified files or, without a scope, recently changed files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit selected files or recent changes for web security problems. It is useful before review or release when checking authorization, cryptography, input handling, and configuration.
Why use it?
It gives a structured way to look for issues such as broken access control, exposed secrets, injection, missing validation, and unsafe configuration. It helps focus security checks on the relevant part of a codebase.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/security-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CloudAI-X/opencode-workflow
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 856 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.00856
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00428
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00171
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00086

Measured 2d ago against content hash 1c33c3f71290, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/security-audit.md · 154 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Audit Command

Perform a comprehensive security audit of the codebase or specific files, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and common security issues.

Phase 1: Scope Identification

Determine audit scope:

  1. If $ARGUMENTS provided, focus on specified files/directories
  2. If no arguments, audit recently changed files via git diff --name-only HEAD~5
  3. Identify file types and relevant security concerns for each

Phase 2: OWASP Top 10 Analysis

Check for each OWASP Top 10 (2021) vulnerability:

A01: Broken Access Control

  • Missing authorization checks
  • IDOR vulnerabilities
  • Path traversal risks
  • Privilege escalation possibilities

A02: Cryptographic Failures

  • Hardcoded secrets or API keys
  • Weak encryption algorithms
  • Missing encryption for sensitive data
  • Insecure random number generation

A03: Injection

  • SQL injection vectors
  • Command injection risks
  • XSS vulnerabilities
  • Template injection
  • LDAP/XML injection

A04: Insecure Design

  • Missing rate limiting
  • Lack of input validation
  • Trust boundary violations
  • Missing security controls

A05: Security Misconfiguration

  • Debug mode in production
  • Default credentials
  • Overly permissive CORS
  • Missing security headers
  • Exposed error messages

A06: Vulnerable Components

  • Check package.json / requirements.txt / go.mod for known vulnerabilities
  • Outdated dependencies
  • Deprecated functions

A07: Authentication Failures

  • Weak password policies
  • Missing MFA considerations
  • Session management issues
  • Credential stuffing vectors

A08: Software and Data Integrity Failures

  • Missing integrity checks
  • Insecure deserialization
  • Unsigned updates or data

A09: Security Logging Failures

  • Missing audit logs
  • Sensitive data in logs
  • Insufficient monitoring

A10: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

  • Unvalidated URLs
  • Internal network access risks
  • Cloud metadata exposure

Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis

Search for dangerous patterns:

Patterns to detect:
- eval(), exec(), system() calls with user input
- Unsanitized SQL queries
- innerHTML with user data
- Disabled security features (verify=False, etc.)
- Hardcoded credentials (password=, secret=, api_key=)
- Debug/verbose modes
- TODO/FIXME security comments

Read the full file on GitHub · 154 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 154 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1c33c3f71290

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository CloudAI-X/opencode-workflow (274 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 856 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.