Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CloudAI-X/opencode-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/test-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/test-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/test-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/test-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/test-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00987 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00395 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
test-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Design Command
Plan comprehensive test coverage strategy for new or existing code using the test-architect subagent.
Phase 1: Understand the Target
Analyze what needs testing:
- If
$ARGUMENTSprovided, focus on specified files/features - Read the target code and understand:
- Public interfaces and contracts
- Business logic and edge cases
- Dependencies and integrations
- Error handling paths
Phase 2: Test Pyramid Analysis
Determine appropriate test distribution:
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (Few)
/----\ - Critical user journeys
/ \ - Cross-system validation
/--------\
/ \ Integration Tests (Some)
/ \ - API contracts
/ \ - Database interactions
/----------------\ - External service mocks
/ \
/ Unit Tests \ (Many)
/ (Foundation) \
/----------------------\
Unit Test Candidates
- Pure functions
- Business logic
- Data transformations
- Validation rules
- Edge cases and boundaries
Integration Test Candidates
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Message queues
- External service calls
- Authentication flows
E2E Test Candidates
- Critical user journeys
- Checkout/payment flows
- Authentication sequences
- Multi-step workflows
Phase 3: Test Case Generation
For each identified test target, design:
Test Case Template
Feature: [Feature Name]
Scenario: [Scenario Description]
Given: [Initial State]
When: [Action Taken]
Then: [Expected Outcome]
Edge Cases:
- [Edge case 1]
- [Edge case 2]
Error Cases:
- [Error scenario 1]
- [Error scenario 2]
Coverage Strategy
- Happy path (normal flow)
- Boundary conditions
- Error handling
- Null/undefined inputs
- Concurrent access (if applicable)
- Performance constraints
Phase 4: Framework Detection & Setup
Detect existing test infrastructure:
- Jest/Vitest for JavaScript/TypeScript
- pytest for Python
- go test for Go
- JUnit for Java
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A e2525a63c182
test-design is a command published in the GitHub repository CloudAI-X/opencode-workflow (276 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 987 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-suite
Run comprehensive test suite with coverage analysis.
gsd:add-tests
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation.
test
Escrever e rodar testes (skill 05 — QA Engineer).
quality-check-command
This command performs comprehensive code quality checks. Use it before commits or when implementation is complete.
test
Load the testing strategies skill for 3-tier testing with NO MOCKING policy enforcement in Tier 2-3.
verify
You are invoking the verify skill - comprehensive verification following Boris Cherny's pattern.