Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clownware/product-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/clownware/product-dev/summary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/clownware/product-dev/summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/clownware/product-dev/summary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/clownware/product-dev/summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/clownware/product-dev/summary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00526 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
summary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate a Project Brief — a single prose document from the design artifacts in .product-dev/artifacts/.
This is the lightweight alternative to /compile. Use /summary when you want a human-readable overview. Use /compile when you want a validated, agent-consumable spec package.
Gate Check
Read .product-dev/context.json. Require at least problem_statement and solution_concept to exist. If missing:
"Not enough artifacts to produce a meaningful brief. Run
/ideato build a solution concept first."
Execution
-
Read all available design artifacts from
.product-dev/artifacts/:initial_concept.mdproblem_statement.mdproto_persona.mdcore_objective.mdsolution_concept.mdhypothesis_statement.mduser_flow.mdscreen_inventory.md(if exists)prototype_scope.md(if exists)test_questions.md(if exists)
-
Assemble into a single document with this structure:
# Project Brief — {project_name}
Generated: {date}
Tier: {tier}
## Problem
{problem_statement content}
## Target User
{proto_persona content}
## Objective
{core_objective content}
## Solution Concept
{solution_concept content}
## Hypothesis
{hypothesis_statement content}
## User Flow
{user_flow content — if YAML, summarize the steps as prose}
## Screens & States
{screen_inventory content, or "Not applicable" if missing}
## Prototype Scope
{prototype_scope content, or "Not yet defined" if missing}
-
Write to
.product-dev/artifacts/project_brief.md -
Update
context.jsonwithproject_briefartifact entry. -
Suggest next step:
"Brief generated. When you're ready to produce a full spec package with structured YAML, validation, and implementation handoff, run
/compile."
Rules
- Do not rewrite or editorialize. Assemble existing artifact content with minimal connective text.
- Mark gaps. Include section headers for missing artifacts with a note about what's needed.
- Keep it under 2000 words. Summarize verbose artifacts to key points.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A bee881a4fbca
summary is a command published in the GitHub repository clownware/product-dev (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 526 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
design-audit
Audit an existing HTML/CSS design. Deterministic checks only (contrast, fonts, colors, states, dark mode) plus a visual pass. No generation.
design-mobile
Design a mobile screen or flow. This command never writes SwiftUI or Compose — the deliverable is a device-framed HTML mockup plus a handoff spec for the platform developer.
design-component
Generate a single component using existing design-system.md tokens. Skips inspiration browsing — fast path for isolated UI elements.
design-page
New page or screen in an existing project. Skips design-system creation — reuses the existing design-system.md tokens.
design
Full design pipeline for a web or web-app target: brief → tokens → generation → motion → review. Use /design:mobile for iOS/Android instead.
dt
Design Thinking mode: /dt toggles, on|off|status set/query, anything else runs as a prompt with mode on.