Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/codeready-toolchain/tarsy/rmslopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codeready-toolchain/tarsyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/codeready-toolchain/tarsy/rmslop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/codeready-toolchain/tarsy/rmslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/codeready-toolchain/tarsy/rmslop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00101 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00051 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
rmslop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Diff this branch against master and remove AI-generated slop introduced here:
- Comments a human would not add / inconsistent with the file
- Extra defensive try/catch abnormal for trusted call paths
anycasts to silence types- Style inconsistent with surrounding code
- Unnecessary emoji
Keep behavior identical. End with a 1–3 sentence summary of edits only.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 16 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 9400a7fc575c
rmslop is a command published in the GitHub repository codeready-toolchain/tarsy (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 101 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
full-review
Orchestrate comprehensive multi-dimensional code review using specialized review agents across architecture, security, performance, testing, and best practices.
pr-enhance
You are a PR optimization expert specializing in creating high-quality pull requests that facilitate efficient code reviews. Generate comprehensive PR descriptions, automate review processes, and ensure PRs follow best practices for clarity, size, and reviewability.
tech-debt
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create actionable remediation plans.
team-review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions.
review-feedback
Review a given code review markdown document, GitHub PR review, or inline feedback — corroborate each point against actual code, then implement valid changes.