Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spencermarx/open-code-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/map/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/map.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00048 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00019 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- map — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
OCR: Map
This command is managed by Open Code Review.
Execute this command by reading and following: .ocr/commands/map.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A da2c525342d4
map is a command published in the GitHub repository spencermarx/open-code-review (378 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 48 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
assemble-team
Assemble a pre-built agent team for parallel work - review, feature, debug, cross-platform, full-stack, or research.
audit-project
Multi-agent code review with iterative improvement.
bear
A command that reports the current state of the bear-skills collection, including its domains, skills, installation status, and requirements. A domain groups related skills.
review
Harsh maintainability review of one PR. Comments, not patches. Do not merge.
pr-review
Reviews pull request changes to provide feedback, check for issues, and suggest improvements before merging into the main codebase.
code-review
Perform a comprehensive code review of recent changes.