Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cognitx-leyton/codegraph. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/main/.claude/commands/graph.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cognitx-leyton/codegraphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/graph/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/graph.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00281 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Usage
/graph <cypher>
Runs the Cypher against the local Neo4j instance via codegraph query --json. Read-only — writes (CREATE, MERGE, DELETE, SET) are not rejected at the CLI level (unlike the MCP server), so be careful what you execute. If you're unsure, stick to MATCH queries.
Assumes:
- Neo4j is up at
bolt://localhost:7688(docker compose up -dfromcodegraph/if not). - The graph has been indexed at least once (run
/graph-refreshif you get zero results on queries you expect to match).
Canonical query patterns for this repo
~20 files, 56 classes, 134 module functions, ~180 methods
Blast radius — who depends on a file?
MATCH (f:File)-[:IMPORTS]->(target:File {path: 'codegraph/codegraph/schema.py'})
RETURN f.path AS caller
ORDER BY f.path
Who imports a specific symbol?
MATCH (f:File)-[r:IMPORTS_SYMBOL]->(g:File)
WHERE r.symbol = 'IgnoreFilter'
RETURN f.path AS caller, g.path AS source
Find a class by substring
MATCH (c:Class)
WHERE c.name CONTAINS 'Node' AND c.file STARTS WITH 'codegraph/codegraph/'
RETURN c.name, c.file
ORDER BY c.name
Methods on a class
MATCH (c:Class {name: 'IgnoreFilter'})-[:HAS_METHOD]->(m:Method)
RETURN m.name, m.visibility, m.is_constructor
ORDER BY m.name
Census of dataclasses
MATCH (f:File)-[:DEFINES_CLASS]->(c:Class)-[:DECORATED_BY]->(d:Decorator {name: 'dataclass'})
WHERE f.path STARTS WITH 'codegraph/codegraph/'
RETURN f.path, count(c) AS dataclass_count
ORDER BY dataclass_count DESC
What decorators does a file use?
MATCH (:File {path: 'codegraph/codegraph/mcp.py'})-[:DEFINES_FUNC]->(fn:Function)-[:DECORATED_BY]->(d:Decorator)
RETURN fn.name, d.name
ORDER BY fn.name
Unresolved (external) imports from a file
MATCH (:File {path: 'codegraph/codegraph/cli.py'})-[r:IMPORTS {external: true}]->(e:External)
RETURN e.specifier
ORDER BY e.specifier
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A c5336995e375
graph is a command published in the GitHub repository cognitx-leyton/codegraph (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
analyze
Full GoSQLX analysis of a SQL string or .sql file (validity, metadata, security, lint, formatting).
format
Format a SQL string or .sql file with GoSQLX.
security
Scan a SQL string, .sql file, or SQL-building source file for injection risks with GoSQLX.
lint
Lint a SQL string or .sql file with GoSQLX style rules (L001-L010).
feedback
A design-stage security review for product requirement documents and other planning documents; a PRD is a document describing what a product should do.
va
A read-only security review of a codebase across eight architecture areas, with findings checked against file-and-line evidence.