Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/contract-hero/sui-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/contract-hero/sui-pilot/move-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00191 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
move-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the move-code-review skill to perform a security and architecture review of the Move package in the current directory.
What This Command Does
- Audits 40 checks across 6 categories (security, design, patterns, testing, quality, configuration)
- Reviews access control, arithmetic safety, object ownership
- Identifies shared object congestion risks
- Flags missing test coverage gaps
- Produces severity-scored findings (S1-Critical to S4-Low)
When to Use
- Before deploying to mainnet
- During pre-audit preparation
- When reviewing untrusted code
- For security-focused PR reviews
Related Commands
/move-code-quality— Syntax and idiom analysis (different scope)/oz-math— Concrete fixes for SEC-AR-* arithmetic findings
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 27 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A e79336d808d0
move-code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository contract-hero/sui-pilot (10 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-strict
Multi-pass consensus audit — runs the audit twice with different prompts, only reports consensus findings. Aggressively cuts false positives.
define-events
Produces instrumentation specification with events, properties, owners, and QA steps.
hypothesis
Generate hypotheses and define how to test them.
question-mode
When this command is used, switch to the specified operational mode. Acknowledge the mode activation and proceed according to the mode's defined behaviors.
gse-meta-audit
Audit the GSE-One methodology repository for coherence (Categories A-D), strategic quality (Category E), and distribution hygiene (Category F). Orchestrates the Python deterministic engine (audit.py, including the 5 Category F distribution jobs) + 23 parallel LLM sub-agents — 28 jobs total, defined in…
diff-review
AI-powered diff review for Solana-specific issues and code quality.