A command that compares your uncommitted Git changes with the project's written coding rules.

Use it to inspect changed files, report issues by severity with file and line references, and decide whether the changes are ready to commit.

It gives a structured review before code is accepted, including security issues, missing tests, and rule violations.

review — Command for Claude Code by Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 8 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 232 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00008	$0.00232
Opus 5.5	$0.00003	$0.00093
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00002	$0.00046
Haiku 4.5	$0.00001	$0.00023

Measured 3d ago against content hash dcc2f981e611, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

configs/agnostic/commands/review.md · 24 lines

What it actually says

/review

Review git diff HEAD against the rules in .claude/rules/.

Checklist

Compliance with the rule of the edited area (.claude/rules/<area>.md)
CLAUDE.md: type hints, no print/console.log, no credentials, no duplication
Security: parameterized SQL, no raw dangerouslySetInnerHTML, validated inputs
Auth: new private endpoints have an auth dependency when needed
Tests: new code has a corresponding test
Scope: every changed file and hunk traces to the request; no drive-by refactors, reformatting, unrequested files/deps/config, or weakened existing assertions (skills/guarding-scope)

Report

List of issues by severity (critical / warning / suggestion). For each, cite the file:line.

At the end, say whether it is OK for /done or whether it needs fixing first.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

3d ago Changed · +1 lines dcc2f981e611
2mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 03f7d119d3b3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 232 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Claude Code Code review agent-skills ai-agents anthropic claude claude-skills

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
reviewCristhianzl/claude-skills-czl	Command	5	3d ago	MIT	A	8	Claude Code
review-prKhaledSaeed18/dotclaude	Command	5	yesterday	MIT	A	95	Claude Code
bugfixtonychen15/xReview	Command	2	4d ago	MIT	A	0	Claude Code
featuretonychen15/xReview	Command	2	4d ago	MIT	A	0	Claude Code
confirm-revisionsHubWizard/second-pass	Command	2	6mo ago	MIT	A	39	Claude Code
passing-gradeHubWizard/second-pass	Command	2	6mo ago	MIT	A	31	Claude Code
strictHubWizard/second-pass	Command	2	6mo ago	MIT	A	33	Claude Code