Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hubwizard/second-pass/confirm-revisionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HubWizard/second-passWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hubwizard/second-pass/confirm-revisions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hubwizard/second-pass/confirm-revisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hubwizard/second-pass/confirm-revisions.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00383 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
confirm-revisions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Set Second Pass confirm-revisions flag
The user wants to set confirm_revisions to: $ARGUMENTS
Perform these steps:
-
Validate the argument. Must be
trueorfalse(case-insensitive). Reject anything else with:Invalid value. Usage: /second-pass:confirm-revisions <true|false>and stop.
-
Ensure the config directory exists:
~/.claude/second-pass/. Create it if missing. -
Read existing config at
~/.claude/second-pass/config.jsonif it exists. If it does not exist, start from defaults:{"passing_grade": "B", "iteration_cap": 3, "confirm_revisions": false} -
Update
confirm_revisionsto the parsed boolean. Preserve all other fields unchanged. -
Write the updated config back to
~/.claude/second-pass/config.jsonas valid JSON (pretty-printed, 2-space indent). -
Confirm to the user in a single line:
- If true:
Second Pass confirm-revisions set to true. Revisions are re-judged in a loop (more confidence, more tokens). - If false:
Second Pass confirm-revisions set to false. Revisions ship after one pass (default, cheaper).
- If true:
Do not ask the user questions. Do not list the rubric. Do not explain what Second Pass is. This is a config change — be terse and done.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 34 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 263cd607f3f1
confirm-revisions is a command published in the GitHub repository HubWizard/second-pass (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 383 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
코드를 적대적 관점에서 리뷰하고, 숨겨진 문제를 찾아낸다. — MUST TRIGGER: 커밋 전(로직 변경 시), PR 생성 전, 버그 수정 후 회귀 확인 시.
evolve
기술 동향을 스캔하고 Nova를 자동으로 진화시킨다. 사용자 대신 Nova 품질 게이트가 변경을 검증한다.
run
구현→검증을 한 사이클로 실행한다 (Full Cycle). --verify-only로 검증만 수행 가능.
ux-audit
5인 적대적 평가자로 UI/UX를 다관점 심층 평가. 접근성(WCAG 2.2)·인지 부하·성능(Core Web Vitals)·다크 패턴(EU DSA)까지 코드 기반 분석.
check
코드 품질 리뷰 + 설계-구현 정합성 검증을 한 번에 수행한다. — MUST TRIGGER: 커밋 전(3파일 이상 변경 시), 스프린트 완료 시, 사용자가 버그를 보고한 직후.
migrate-state
NOVA-STATE.md를 최신 v3 work-item registry로 변환한다. v1/v2 입력 모두 직접 v3 가능. dry-run → 사용자 검수 → apply + drift-check 자동. — MUST TRIGGER: 사용자가 STATE 변환 요청한 직후, session-start v1/v2 hint를 본 직후, 또는 .nova/work-items/ 부재.