Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-mariano/spicyclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/d-mariano/spicyclaude/design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/d-mariano/spicyclaude/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/d-mariano/spicyclaude/design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/d-mariano/spicyclaude/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/d-mariano/spicyclaude/design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00170 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
I need to create a technical design for the following task:
$ARGUMENTS
Before starting, determine the right workflow:
-
Check if an existing codebase is present in the working directory. Look for package manifests, src directories, and code files.
-
Classify the task:
- Greenfield: No relevant codebase, or building an entirely new system/service → Read and follow
.claude/skills/greenfield-design/SKILL.md - Feature Integration: Adding to an existing codebase, preserving existing patterns → Read and follow
.claude/skills/feature-integration/SKILL.md - Greenfield + Refactor: Rebuilding a system from scratch with migration from the old → Read
.claude/skills/greenfield-design/SKILL.mdAND.claude/skills/refactor-modifier/SKILL.md, apply the modifier's additions at each phase - Integration + Refactor: Restructuring within an existing system → Read
.claude/skills/feature-integration/SKILL.mdAND.claude/skills/refactor-modifier/SKILL.md, apply the modifier's additions at each phase
- Greenfield: No relevant codebase, or building an entirely new system/service → Read and follow
-
Present your classification to me with reasoning. Ask me to confirm or override before proceeding.
-
Once confirmed, execute the selected workflow from Phase 1, pausing after each phase for my review.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 22d569bc8703
design is a command published in the GitHub repository d-mariano/spicyclaude (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
profile
Save, load, inspect, update, reset, or delete diagram-design client profiles.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
team-ui
Orchestrate UI/UX design team.
p3-ux-wireframes
Creates wireframes (ASCII art) for the most important screens with interaction descriptions.