Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DauQuangThanh/hanoi-rainbowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/tasks-to-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/tasks-to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/tasks-to-issues/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/tasks-to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/tasks-to-issues.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00335 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
tasks-to-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to speckit.taskstoissues — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
IMPORTANT: After creating all GitHub issues, automatically generate a 'chore:' prefixed git commit message (e.g., 'chore: sync tasks to GitHub issues') and commit any tracking files or metadata upon completion.
- Run
{SCRIPT}from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). - From the executed script, extract the path to tasks.
- Get the Git remote by running:
git config --get remote.origin.url
ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
- For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 34 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 65daf3330c18
tasks-to-issues is a command published in the GitHub repository DauQuangThanh/hanoi-rainbow (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 335 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to speckit.taskstoissues, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
team
The team command manages team members and messages for your Codev project. Team data is stored in codev/team/ and displayed in the Tower dashboard.
sddp-implement-qc-loop
Command description: Run implement and QC in a continuous loop. Argument hint: [optional: feature directory or branch name] Command category: orchestration Prerequisites: spec, plan, tasks.
sddp-analyze
Command description: Audit spec, plan, and tasks for consistency and quality. Argument hint: [optional: analysis focus or remediation request] Command category: feature-delivery Prerequisites: spec, plan, tasks.
sddp-clarify
Command description: Reduce ambiguity in the current feature specification. Argument hint: [optional: ambiguity focus or feature directory] Command category: feature-delivery Prerequisites: spec.
sddp-prd
Command description: Create or refine the canonical product document. Argument hint: [rough product idea, users, domain, or market opportunity] Command category: project-bootstrap Prerequisites: none.
sddp-tasks
Command description: Generate an actionable task list from the current plan. Argument hint: [optional: feature directory or task focus] Command category: feature-delivery Prerequisites: spec, plan.