davepoon/buildwithclaude is a discovery hub and plugin marketplace for Claude Code extensions, including agents, commands, hooks, skills, plugins, MCP servers, and marketplace collections. Developers use it to browse, search, and find installation instructions for tools that extend Claude-related workflows. Catalogue entries include agents, plugins, commands, and skills from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davepoon/buildwithclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/davepoon/buildwithclaude/sequential-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/davepoon/buildwithclaude/sequential-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/davepoon/buildwithclaude/sequential-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/davepoon/buildwithclaude/sequential-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/davepoon/buildwithclaude/sequential-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00736 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
sequential-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are creating a sequential AG2 agent pipeline. Each agent processes output from the previous one.
Instructions
-
Ask the user for:
- The pipeline stages and what each does
- Whether any stage needs tools
- Input/output format expectations
- Error handling: stop on failure or continue?
-
Create the sequential workflow:
Sequential Pipeline Pattern
from autogen import ConversableAgent
# --- Define Pipeline Stages ---
stage_1 = ConversableAgent(
name="Extractor",
description="Extracts structured data from raw input",
system_message="""You extract structured data from the input.
Output format: JSON with the extracted fields.
Always output valid JSON. Do not include explanations outside the JSON block.""",
llm_config={"model": "gpt-4o-mini"},
)
stage_2 = ConversableAgent(
name="Transformer",
description="Transforms and enriches extracted data",
system_message="""You receive extracted data and transform it.
- Normalize formats
- Enrich with derived fields
- Validate completeness
Output format: JSON with transformed data.""",
llm_config={"model": "gpt-4o-mini"},
)
stage_3 = ConversableAgent(
name="Reporter",
description="Generates a human-readable report from processed data",
system_message="""You receive processed data and create a clear report.
- Summarize key findings
- Highlight anomalies
- Provide actionable recommendations""",
llm_config={"model": "gpt-4o-mini"},
)
# --- Run Sequential Pipeline ---
# Stage 1: Extract
result_1 = stage_1.initiate_chat(
stage_2,
message="Raw input data here...",
max_turns=1, # Single exchange per stage
)
# Stage 2 -> Stage 3: Transform and Report
result_2 = stage_2.initiate_chat(
stage_3,
message=result_1.summary, # Pass output forward
max_turns=1,
)
# Final output
final_report = result_2.summary
Pipeline with Validation Gate
# Add a validation step between stages
validator = ConversableAgent(
name="Validator",
description="Validates data quality between pipeline stages",
system_message="""You validate the data passed to you.
Check for:
- Required fields present
- Data types correct
- Values within expected ranges
If valid, respond with: VALID: <the original data>
If invalid, respond with: INVALID: <description of issues>""",
llm_config={"model": "gpt-4o-mini"},
)
# Run with validation
result = stage_1.initiate_chat(validator, message=input_data, max_turns=1)
if "VALID:" in result.summary:
# Continue pipeline
stage_2.initiate_chat(stage_3, message=result.summary, max_turns=1)
else:
# Handle validation failure
print(f"Pipeline stopped: {result.summary}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 865e1d9a2005
sequential-workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository davepoon/buildwithclaude (3,674 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 736 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
convert-to-todowrite-tasklist-prompt
Purpose: Transform verbose, context-heavy slash commands into efficient TodoWrite tasklist-based methods with parallel subagent execution for 60-70% speed improvements.
security-audit
Perform a comprehensive security audit of the codebase to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practice violations.
better-auth:add-plugin
Add a better-auth plugin to an existing project. Configures server and client plugins with proper imports.
CHANGELOG
All notable changes to the @mstar-harness/commands package are documented in this file.
audit
Perform security audit on codebase.
review-tasks
A command that reviews a task list for fidelity to its source plans, practical executability, dependencies, and ways to verify completion. It can use project requirements, specifications, designs, plans, and repository files.