aod.discover

A feature-idea capture tool that records ideas in GitHub Issues and rates them for impact, confidence, and effort. GitHub Issues are shared project records used to track work over time.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to record a new idea, collect its source and supporting evidence, calculate an ICE score, and add it to the project backlog.
Why use it?
It keeps ideas from being scattered across notes and gives the team a consistent way to decide which ones deserve attention.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/aod.discover
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,142 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00013 $0.01142
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00571
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00228
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00114

Measured 2d ago against content hash 468ed9f69fe5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aod.discover scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to aod.discover — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/aod.discover.md · 82 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

Consider user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Overview

Captures a raw feature idea, scores it with ICE (Impact, Confidence, Effort), and creates a GitHub Issue for lifecycle tracking.

Source of truth: GitHub Issues with stage:* labels. BACKLOG.md is auto-generated.

Flow: Parse idea → Generate ID from GitHub Issues → Capture source → ICE scoring → Evidence → Auto-defer gate → Create GitHub Issue → Regenerate BACKLOG.md → Report result

Flags

  • --seed: Fast-track mode for pre-vetted ideas. Skips ICE prompts, evidence, source, and PM validation. Auto-assigns P1 defaults (I:8 C:7 E:7 = 22). Usage: /aod.discover --seed My feature idea
  • --autonomous: Auto-select defaults for all interactive prompts (used by aod.run orchestrator). See Step 0.

Step 0: Parse --autonomous

  1. If $ARGUMENTS contains --autonomous:
    • Set autonomous = true
    • Strip --autonomous from $ARGUMENTS (trim extra whitespace)
  2. Default: autonomous = false

Step 1: Validate Input

  1. Parse idea description from $ARGUMENTS
  2. If empty: Ask the user to describe their idea before proceeding

Step 2: Execute Idea Capture

Follow the workflow defined in the ~aod-discover skill (.claude/skills/~aod-discover/SKILL.md):

  1. Create GitHub Issue and use the auto-assigned Issue number as the canonical ID
  2. Capture source via AskUserQuestion (Brainstorm / Customer Feedback / Team Idea / User Request)
    • If autonomous == true: Auto-select "Team Idea". Display: "Auto-selected: Team Idea (autonomous mode)"
  3. ICE scoring via AskUserQuestion (Impact, Confidence, Effort — each H9/M6/L3 or custom 1-10)
    • If autonomous == true: Auto-assign medium defaults: Impact=6, Confidence=6, Effort=6 (total=18). Display: "Auto-selected: ICE 6/6/6 = 18 (autonomous mode)"
  4. Evidence prompt via AskUserQuestion
    • If autonomous == true: Auto-provide "Automated discovery via aod.run". Display: "Auto-selected: automated evidence (autonomous mode)"
  5. Compute ICE total, apply auto-defer gate (< 12 = Deferred, >= 12 = Scoring)
  6. Create GitHub Issue with structured body and stage:discover label
  7. Regenerate BACKLOG.md via .aod/scripts/bash/backlog-regenerate.sh
  8. Report result with ID, ICE breakdown, priority tier, and next step guidance

Read the full file on GitHub · 82 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 82 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 468ed9f69fe5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aod.discover is a command published in the GitHub repository davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,142 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to aod.discover, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.