Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to davidmatousek/tachi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidmatousek/tachi/main/.claude/commands/aod.okrs.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidmatousek/tachiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/davidmatousek/tachi/aod.okrs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/davidmatousek/tachi/aod.okrs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/davidmatousek/tachi/aod.okrs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01284 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00642 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00257 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
aod.okrs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- aod.okrs — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Consider user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Overview
Scaffolds a quarterly OKR (Objectives and Key Results) document in docs/product/06_OKRs/ with a PM sign-off gate.
Flow: Determine quarter → Scaffold OKR template → PM sign-off → Write file
Step 1: Determine Quarter
- Parse current date to determine the quarter:
- Jan-Mar → Q1
- Apr-Jun → Q2
- Jul-Sep → Q3
- Oct-Dec → Q4
- Format as
YYYY-QN(e.g.,2026-Q1) - If
$ARGUMENTScontains a quarter override (e.g.,2026-Q2), use that instead - Check if
docs/product/06_OKRs/{quarter}.mdalready exists- If exists: Use AskUserQuestion with options: View existing, Create with suffix (v2), Abort
Step 2: Gather Context (Optional)
- If
docs/product/03_Product_Roadmap/contains a roadmap for the same quarter, read it for alignment context - If
docs/product/01_Product_Vision/product-vision.mdexists, read mission statement for objective alignment - Store as
contextfor template population hints
Step 3: Scaffold OKR Document
Build the OKR document with standard template:
---
okrs:
quarter: {YYYY-QN}
created: {YYYY-MM-DD}
status: Draft
review_date: null
triad:
pm_signoff: null # Populated after review
---
# {{PROJECT_NAME}} OKRs — {YYYY-QN}
**Quarter**: {QN} {YYYY}
**Status**: Draft
**Created**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Review Date**: [Schedule end-of-quarter review]
## Objective 1: [Qualitative Goal]
**Why This Matters**: [Alignment with product vision]
### Key Result 1.1: [Measurable Outcome]
- **Baseline**: [Starting value]
- **Target**: [End of quarter goal]
- **Current**: —
- **Status**: Not Started
- **Owner**: [Team member]
### Key Result 1.2: [Measurable Outcome]
- **Baseline**: [Starting value]
- **Target**: [End of quarter goal]
- **Current**: —
- **Status**: Not Started
- **Owner**: [Team member]
## Objective 2: [Qualitative Goal]
**Why This Matters**: [Alignment with product vision]
### Key Result 2.1: [Measurable Outcome]
- **Baseline**: [Starting value]
- **Target**: [End of quarter goal]
- **Current**: —
- **Status**: Not Started
- **Owner**: [Team member]
### Key Result 2.2: [Measurable Outcome]
- **Baseline**: [Starting value]
- **Target**: [End of quarter goal]
- **Current**: —
- **Status**: Not Started
- **Owner**: [Team member]
---
## Progress Tracking
**Week of [Date]**:
- KR 1.1: [Update]
- KR 1.2: [Update]
- KR 2.1: [Update]
- KR 2.2: [Update]
**Risks**:
- [Identified risks to OKR achievement]
**Actions**:
- [ ] [Action items to address risks]
---
## Scoring Guide
At end of quarter, score each Key Result:
- **1.0**: Fully achieved
- **0.7**: Strong progress, nearly there
- **0.4**: Some progress, but short of target
- **0.0**: No meaningful progress
**Target average**: 0.6–0.7 (stretch goals should be ambitious)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 186 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A b471f281fd60
aod.okrs is a command published in the GitHub repository davidmatousek/tachi (90 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,284 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
fortigate
Run cs-security-analyst (AT + CA workflows) against the Fintech FortiGate zero-day scenario and produce a 7-task scorecard.
challenge
Run cs-security-analyst (AT workflow) against the Perfect Storm 8-vector crisis scenario and produce a 12-check mock comparison scorecard.
test
Run a USAP skill against the FortiGate zero-day test scenario and produce a 6-problem compliance scorecard.
run
Load a USAP skill SKILL.md and activate it as your operating persona. Argument: skill slug.
sicario.apply-findings
Convert approved SicarioSpec review findings into tasks.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.