Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.03360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01344 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00672 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00336 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +22 lines d01eabc33e2f
- 3d ago Changed · +8 lines 955b0904cab6
- 7d ago Changed · +25 lines 881df4dcfae5
- 8d ago Changed · +19 lines · +2 tokens per session a029a37f5087
- 13d ago Changed · +39 lines · +1 tokens per session 304238231a6d
- 16d ago Changed · -4 lines e0367310475e
- 21d ago Changed a261a7e99fd4
- 24d ago Changed a9251ffa1050
- 27d ago Changed · +1 lines · +2 tokens per session 93fb760f23ae
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a1208084b955
research is a command published in the GitHub repository dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude (6 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,360 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Verification review of a named agent's claim. Ends in acquittal or replacement.
review
Phase 50 — 6-agent parallel quality review of a completed wave (Wave 3c).
review-skills
Review changed skills: automated bash checks + 9 structural dimensions (D1-D9) + 5 intent checks (M1-M5). PASS/FAIL verdict. Fix in-place.
app-review
Run code review on a specific branch or open PR-equivalent.
harness-sync
Detect drift across all push-direction control surfaces, present the full picture, and apply the user's selected fixes via the existing primitives — single human-instigated entry point for keeping convention files in sync with HARNESS.md. ONBOARDING.md staleness is surfaced but not auto-fixed; users run…
harness-affordance
Manage the project's affordance inventory — declared tools the agent can invoke, the identity each tool runs under, and the audit trail each tool produces. Subcommands - discover (scan config to produce a draft inventory), add (promote a draft into HARNESS.md with governance metadata), review (re-validate one…