commit-review

A Git command that reviews your staged or unstaged changes and advises whether they belong in one commit or several focused commits.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before committing to analyze changed files, decide how to group them, and preview suitable commit messages.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unrelated changes from being bundled together, making each commit easier to understand and review.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/dhofheinz/open-plugins/commit-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhofheinz/open-plugins
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,537 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.04537
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.02269
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00907
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00454

Measured 2d ago against content hash 49aa52cff86e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

commit-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/git-commit-assistant/commands/commit-review.md · 687 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 687 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Commit Review - Analyze Changes for Atomic Commits

Review your staged or unstaged changes and receive recommendations on whether to create a single commit or split into multiple atomic commits.

Overview

The /commit-review command provides comprehensive change analysis by orchestrating multiple analytical skills to determine whether your changes should be committed as one atomic commit or split into multiple focused commits.

Skills Orchestrated

This command coordinates:

  1. commit-error-handling - Repository state validation

    • Operation: /commit-error-handling diagnose-issues
    • Ensures repository is ready for analysis
  2. commit-analysis - Multi-dimensional change analysis

    • Operation: /commit-analysis analyze
    • Detects: types, scopes, file changes, atomicity
    • Provides: Comprehensive change breakdown
  3. atomic-commit - Splitting analysis

    • Operations:
      • /atomic-commit analyze - Determine if should split
      • /atomic-commit group strategy:type - Group files by type
      • /atomic-commit suggest - Generate commit breakdown
    • Provides: Detailed splitting recommendations
  4. message-generation - Preview commit messages

    • Operation: /message-generation complete
    • Generates: Suggested messages for each commit group
  5. history-analysis (optional) - Project convention awareness

    • Operation: /history-analysis analyze-style
    • Ensures: Recommendations match project style

Workflow Integration

After /commit-review shows recommendations:

If single commit recommended: → Use /commit to create the commit

If split recommended: → Use /commit-split for interactive splitting → OR use /atomic-commit interactive for granular control → OR manually commit each group

For Granular Control

Analyze specific aspects independently:

  • /commit-analysis detect-type - Just classify change types
  • /commit-analysis assess-atomicity - Just check atomicity
  • /atomic-commit group - Just group files
  • /atomic-commit suggest - Just get commit suggestions

Read the full file on GitHub · 687 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 687 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 49aa52cff86e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

commit-review is a command published in the GitHub repository dhofheinz/open-plugins (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 4,537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.