Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhslegen/digital-delivery-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/dhslegen/digital-delivery-team/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dhslegen/digital-delivery-team/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dhslegen/digital-delivery-team/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/dhslegen/digital-delivery-team/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/dhslegen/digital-delivery-team/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00519 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00208 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/verify
关键约束
在同一条消息内同时发出两个 Task 工具调用：
- Task 1：
test-agent（执行测试 + 覆盖率） - Task 2：
review-agent（代码评审，基线main）
前置校验
test -f docs/prd.md || { echo "❌ 请先运行 /prd"; exit 1; }
test -f docs/api-contract.yaml || { echo "❌ 请先运行 /design"; exit 1; }
# v0.9.11 D28 软提醒：建议先 /integrate 起栈联调，让 /verify 跑在真实栈上
if [ ! -f docs/integrate-report.md ]; then
echo "ℹ️ 建议先跑 /digital-delivery-team:integrate 起栈联调（db + redis + 前后端 + smoke）"
echo " 未跑 /integrate 时 test-agent 仅跑 unit + 契约校验，不验证真实集成。"
echo " 仅后端 API / 别个单元项目可忽略。"
fi
两者都完成后汇总
读取 tests/test-report.md 和 docs/review-report.md，判断放行条件：
| 指标 | 放行条件 |
|---|---|
| 覆盖率 | ≥ 70% |
| 阻塞级评审项 | = 0 |
若任一不满足：
❌ 禁止推进到 /ship，建议下一步：
- 阻塞级 > 0 时：
/fix --severity blocker --apply修复后重跑/verify- 覆盖率不足时：补充测试用例后重跑
/test
/verify 完成
覆盖率: <coverage>% ✅ / ❌
阻塞级评审项: <n> 条 ✅ / ❌
警告级评审项: <n> 条
建议级评审项: <n> 条
若全部放行：
✅ 建议下一步：
/ship
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A ae6e322e810a
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository dhslegen/digital-delivery-team (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 519 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-skills
Review changed skills: automated bash checks + 9 structural dimensions (D1-D9) + 5 intent checks (M1-M5). PASS/FAIL verdict. Fix in-place.
codex-loop
Use Codex as a second, differently-trained reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. Runs autonomously.
claude-loop
Use a fresh headless Claude session (Fable by default) as an independent reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. The /codex-loop pattern on Anthropic usage. Runs autonomously.
test
Run the repository's actual test suite: every ecosystem's canonical runner — NOT run is never green.
ia-verify
Run pre-PR verification chain: build, types, lint, tests, security scan, diff review.
record
Record a browser walkthrough of a URL using Antigravity (agy). Generates .webm video, screenshots, and a report. Auto-converts to MP4 if ffmpeg is available.