Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doncheli/don-cheli-sddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01860 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00744 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00372 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/dc:pr-review
Objetivo
Revisar automáticamente un Pull Request de GitHub analizando el diff, delta de cobertura, implicaciones de seguridad, conformidad con specs y calidad de código. Genera comentarios de revisión con severidad y puede auto-aprobar si todos los checks pasan (configurable).
Uso
/dc:pr-review # Revisar PR del branch actual
/dc:pr-review 42 # Revisar PR #42
/dc:pr-review --repo owner/repo 42 # PR de otro repositorio
/dc:pr-review --dimensiones tests,security # Solo dimensiones específicas
/dc:pr-review --auto-aprobar # Aprobar si todos los checks pasan
/dc:pr-review --seco # Mostrar análisis sin publicar comentarios
Pre-requisitos
gh auth login # Autenticación con GitHub CLI
gh --version # gh >= 2.30 recomendado
Comportamiento
1. OBTENER — Descargar diff y metadata del PR
├── gh pr view <numero> --json title,body,author,additions,deletions,files
├── gh pr diff <numero>
└── gh pr checks <numero>
2. ANALIZAR — 5 dimensiones de revisión
├── Correctness: lógica, edge cases, manejo de errores
├── Tests: delta de cobertura, tests faltantes, calidad de asserts
├── Performance: N+1 queries, operaciones O(n²), memory leaks
├── Security: OWASP Top 10, exposición de datos, auth bypass
└── Style: convenciones del proyecto, naming, complejidad ciclomática
3. GENERAR — Comentarios con severidad por línea o general
├── blocking: Debe corregirse antes de aprobar
├── suggestion: Mejora importante pero no bloqueante
└── nitpick: Preferencia de estilo, opcional
4. PUBLICAR — Subir revisión a GitHub
└── gh pr review <numero> --comment --body "..."
├── Si --auto-aprobar y cero blocking → gh pr review --approve
└── Si hay blocking → gh pr review --request-changes
Las 5 Dimensiones
1. Correctness
Verificar:
- Lógica de negocio implementada correctamente vs spec
- Manejo de casos borde (null, vacío, límites)
- Race conditions en código concurrente
- Manejo de errores explícito (no catch vacíos)
- Invariantes de datos respetados
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 4f323885daf3
pr-review is a command published in the GitHub repository doncheli/don-cheli-sdd (59 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,860 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
pr-review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pr-reviewdoncheli/don-cheli-sdd | Command | 59 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 86 | Claude Code |
| auditSienkLogic/plan-build-run | Command | 18 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| differential-auditjszmajda/lid | Command | 116 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code |
| reviewwesammustafa/opencode-primer | Command | 404 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code, OpenCode |
| amby.convergeambystechcom/AmbyKit | Command | 2 | yesterday | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| analyzexiaobei930/cc-best | Command | 49 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| reviewzahardev/aicontext | Command | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code, OpenCode |