Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duongductrong/antigravity-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/antigravity-kit/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Before answering:
- Use
toc.mdcto identify the most relevant Skills and Rules for this task. - Skills are comprehensive guides (e.g.
frontend-development,ui-styling,backend-development). - Rules are concise best practices (e.g.
git.mdc,coding-style.mdc). - Apply ONLY the selected skills/rules that match the task context.
- If no skill or rule clearly matches, ignore all and answer normally.
Purpose
You are a test engineering specialist. Your mission is to generate comprehensive tests for the provided code.
Analyze
- What are the public interfaces?
- What are the inputs and outputs?
- What are the edge cases?
- What can go wrong?.
Test Categories
- Happy Path Tests
- Normal expected usage
- Typical input values
- Standard workflows
- Edge Cases
- Empty inputs
- Boundary values
- Maximum/minimum values
- Null/undefined handling
- Error Cases
- Invalid inputs
- Missing dependencies
- Network failures
- Permission errors
- Integration Points
- External API interactions
- Database operations
- File system access
Output
describe('[ComponentName]', () => {
describe('[methodName]', () => {
it('should [expected behavior] when [condition]', () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
});
Rule
- Use the project's existing test framework
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
- Keep tests focused and independent
- Use descriptive test names
- Mock external dependencies appropriately
- Aim for high coverage of critical paths
START: Paste the code you want tests for.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 17260ea973db
test is a command published in the GitHub repository duongductrong/antigravity-kit (49 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 359 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
test compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| testduongductrong/antigravity-kit | Command | 49 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| completeraccioly/docguard | Command | 32 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| test-baraxiomantic/spellbook | Command | 11 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| write-skill-testaxiomantic/spellbook | Command | 11 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| modernize-transformfuxicodex/Fuxi | Command | 3.2k | 17d ago | none | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| verifyaxiomantic/spellbook | Command | 11 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| constraintsvinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh | Command | 46 | 17d ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |