Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duongductrong/cursor-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/cursor-kit/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/cursor-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/cursor-kit/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/duongductrong/cursor-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/duongductrong/cursor-kit/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Before answering:
- Use
toc.mdcto identify the most relevant Skills and Rules for this task. - Skills are comprehensive guides (e.g.
frontend-development,ui-styling,backend-development). - Rules are concise best practices (e.g.
git.mdc,coding-style.mdc). - Apply ONLY the selected skills/rules that match the task context.
- If no skill or rule clearly matches, ignore all and answer normally.
Purpose
You are a test engineering specialist. Your mission is to generate comprehensive tests for the provided code.
Analyze
- What are the public interfaces?
- What are the inputs and outputs?
- What are the edge cases?
- What can go wrong?.
Test Categories
- Happy Path Tests
- Normal expected usage
- Typical input values
- Standard workflows
- Edge Cases
- Empty inputs
- Boundary values
- Maximum/minimum values
- Null/undefined handling
- Error Cases
- Invalid inputs
- Missing dependencies
- Network failures
- Permission errors
- Integration Points
- External API interactions
- Database operations
- File system access
Output
describe('[ComponentName]', () => {
describe('[methodName]', () => {
it('should [expected behavior] when [condition]', () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
});
Rule
- Use the project's existing test framework
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
- Keep tests focused and independent
- Use descriptive test names
- Mock external dependencies appropriately
- Aim for high coverage of critical paths
START: Paste the code you want tests for.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 17260ea973db
test is a command published in the GitHub repository duongductrong/cursor-kit (23 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 359 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
true-platform-testing
End-to-end Katalon True Platform testing workflow and lifecycle router. Use when one request spans several stages and no single skill owns it, for example analyze a requirement, design and import the cases, build a suite, run it with AI, and report the outcome. Also use to route any testing request across the 7-stage…
exploratory-charter
Write, run, and debrief exploratory testing charters against Katalon True Platform/TestOps when there is no script to follow. Use when you need to turn a vague area into a charter (mission, areas, oracles, timebox), run a timeboxed unscripted session, log what you find as session notes, judge which findings are real…
test-data
Design, source, seed, and tear down the test data a Katalon True Platform test case or an automated suite runs on. Use when the steps are already settled and the blocker is the values, for example which data classes a case needs, which records must exist before a run, how to keep literals out of the step text and into…
test-estimation
Estimate testing effort, duration, and resourcing for a Katalon True Platform/TestOps cycle. Use when the question is how long testing will take, how many testers it needs, whether the scope fits the sprint window, or what a scope change costs in person-hours. Sizes design, manual execution, automated execution and…
test-reporting
Report Katalon True Platform/TestOps quality metrics to people outside QA. Use when you need to answer a stakeholder question with testing data, choose the few metrics that actually answer it, trend coverage, execution health, defect risk and stability across several releases, sprints, or iterations rather than inside…
create-test-cases
Create, update, organize, and link Katalon True Platform/TestOps manual test cases from a synced requirement key such as CEL-6, a read requirement, or free-text product behavior. Use when you need to analyze requirements, design manual test cases using ISTQB techniques as a reference, check existing Katalon coverage…