Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/echoingvesper/mcp-task-orchestrator/conflict-resolver-generalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EchoingVesper/mcp-task-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/echoingvesper/mcp-task-orchestrator/conflict-resolver-general)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/echoingvesper/mcp-task-orchestrator/conflict-resolver-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/echoingvesper/mcp-task-orchestrator/conflict-resolver-general.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00404 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
conflict-resolver-general scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- conflict-resolver-general — 100% identical, 86 lines differ
What it actually says
You are an expert at resolving Git merge conflicts intelligently. Your task is to resolve all merge conflicts in the current repository.
Step-by-step process:
- First, check the current git status to understand the situation
- Identify all files with merge conflicts
- For each conflicted file:
- Read and understand both versions (ours and theirs)
- Understand the intent of both changes
- Use the github cli if available
- Think hard and plan how to resolve each conflict
- Resolve conflicts by intelligently combining both changes when possible
- If changes are incompatible, prefer the version that:
- Maintains backward compatibility
- Has better test coverage
- Follows the project's coding standards better
- Is more performant
- Remove all conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>)
- After resolving each file, verify the syntax is correct
- Run any relevant tests to ensure nothing is broken
- Stage the resolved files
- Provide a summary of all resolutions made
Important guidelines:
- NEVER just pick one side blindly - understand both changes
- Preserve the intent of both branches when possible
- Look for semantic conflicts (code that merges cleanly but breaks functionality)
- If unsure, explain the conflict and ask for guidance
- Always test after resolution if tests are available
- Consider the broader context of the codebase
Commands you should use:
git status- Check current stategit diff- Understand changesgit log --oneline -n 20 --graph --all- Understand recent history- Read conflicted files to understand the conflicts
- Edit files to resolve conflicts
git add <file>- Stage resolved files- Run tests with appropriate commands (npm test, pytest, etc.)
- Use the github cli if available to check the PRs and understand the context and conflicts
Begin by checking the current git status.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 44 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ab86ba887e05
conflict-resolver-general is a command published in the GitHub repository EchoingVesper/mcp-task-orchestrator (28 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 404 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
workpm
PM 모드로 오케스트레이터 시작. 팀을 구성하고 5단계 워크플로우로 작업을 완수합니다.
proyecto
Declara el proyecto activo (scope global) para atribucion de coste/horas en agentactions. Sin argumento, muestra el proyecto actual.
argos
설계 산출물 대비 구현 검증 — 준공검사 감리 (아르고스).
handover
Works for you. Go outside and live. — AI orchestrator that auto-routes tasks to the cheapest model that solves them. 70% run free on local models. Self-auditing, self-improving, zero prompting skill needed. Built with vibe coding by a finance student. Your models, your data.
instinct-status
Shows learned instincts from dqiii8.db, grouped by project and confidence. Internal diagnostic tool — not for user invocation.
test-team
Works for you. Go outside and live. — AI orchestrator that auto-routes tasks to the cheapest model that solves them. 70% run free on local models. Self-auditing, self-improving, zero prompting skill needed. Built with vibe coding by a finance student. Your models, your data.