Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Ecro/embedeval. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ecro/embedeval/main/.claude/commands/negatives.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ecro/embedevalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ecro/embedeval/negatives)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ecro/embedeval/negatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ecro/embedeval/negatives/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ecro/embedeval/negatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ecro/embedeval/negatives.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01367 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00684 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00342 |
Grade A, and why
negatives scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 310 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/negatives — Interactive mutation-oracle authoring
Communication Protocol
- Be direct. No preamble, no ceremony, no encouragement.
- Show the user concrete content (code, check names, reference snippets) before asking questions.
- Ask ONE decision per AskUserQuestion call — never batch multiple unrelated decisions.
- Never guess judgment calls. If unclear, ask.
- Never skip the oracle gate. A negative that doesn't pass oracle is not landed.
Sequentially author negatives.py for every case that lacks one,
with interactive judgment gates where LLM cannot reliably decide.
Usage
/negatives # sync + resume — work the next pending case
/negatives --status # sync + print progress table and exit
/negatives --case TC_ID # sync + work a specific case
/negatives --category dma # sync + cycle pending cases in a category
/negatives --sync # ONLY reconcile progress file with cases/, print diff, exit
/negatives --skip TC_ID reason # mark TC as skipped with reason (won't revisit)
/negatives --reset TC_ID # re-open a done case
/negatives --init # nuke progress file and rebuild from scratch (destructive)
Every invocation runs auto-sync first — the progress file is always reconciled
with the current cases/ directory before any action. Newly added TCs (from
Yocto/Linux expansion, new categories, etc.) appear automatically as pending
without manual bookkeeping. Removed TCs are flagged as orphaned (not deleted —
may be a rename/typo).
Progress File
Location: plans/negatives-progress.json
Schema:
{
"version": 1,
"generated": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"cases": [
{
"case_id": "dma-002",
"category": "dma",
"priority": 1,
"status": "pending | in-progress | done | skipped | orphaned",
"started_at": "YYYY-MM-DD" or null,
"completed_at": "YYYY-MM-DD" or null,
"notes": "skip reason or oracle warnings" or null
}
]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 310 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 05f729e95dd5
negatives is a command published in the GitHub repository Ecro/embedeval (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,418 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.