Big-AGI is an open-source workspace for using multiple AI models through chat and other AI functions. It is intended for engineers, founders, researchers, and other users who want to work with AI personas, model comparisons, image generation, voice, documents, and code-related features. The catalogue entries provide commands, instructions, and a skill for working with Big-AGI.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/enricoros/big-AGIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/enricoros/big-agi/align-params-uis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/enricoros/big-agi/align-params-uis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/enricoros/big-agi/align-params-uis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00649 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
align-params-uis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit and sync LLM parameter configurations between the two UI editors. Goal: identical value fields in option arrays + equivalent onChange logic. Labels/descriptions can differ for UI space.
Files to Compare:
- Full Model Dialog:
src/modules/llms/models-modal/LLMParametersEditor.tsx(main branch) - Chat Side Panel:
src/apps/chat/components/layout-panel/ChatPanelModelParameters.tsx(main derived branches only)
Reference Documentation:
- Parameter system:
kb/systems/LLM-parameters-system.md - Parameter registry:
src/common/stores/llms/llms.parameters.ts
Task: Perform a comprehensive audit
-
Read both files and extract all option arrays (e.g.,
_reasoningEffortOptions,_antEffortOptions,_geminiThinkingLevelOptions, etc.) -
Check for missing parameters:
- Parameters handled in
LLMParametersEditor.tsxbut NOT inChatPanelModelParameters.tsx - Parameters in
ChatPanelModelParameters.tsx's_interestingParametersarray but missing UI controls - Note: The side panel intentionally shows only "interesting" parameters - focus on those listed in
_interestingParameters
- Parameters handled in
-
Check for value mismatches between corresponding option arrays:
- Different number of options (e.g., 3 vs 4 options)
- Same label but different
value(this causes the bug in issue #926) - Different labels for the same
value - Missing
_UNSPECIFIED/Default option in one but not the other
-
Check onChange handler consistency:
- Both should remove parameter on
_UNSPECIFIEDselection - Both should set explicit values the same way
- Watch for conditions like
value === 'high'that may differ
- Both should remove parameter on
Output Format:
## Parameter Sync Audit Report
### Missing Parameters
- [ ] `llmVndXyz` - In full dialog, missing from side panel
### Value Mismatches
- [ ] `_xyzOptions`:
- Full dialog: [values...]
- Side panel: [values...]
- Issue: [description]
### Handler Inconsistencies
- [ ] `llmVndXyz` onChange differs: [explanation]
### Recommended Fixes
1. [Specific fix with code snippet if needed]
Fix Direction: Full dialog is source of truth. Update side panel to match its values when mismatched.
Notes:
- Side panel uses shorter descriptions (space-constrained) - that's fine
- Variable names may differ (e.g.,
_anthropicEffortOptionsvs_antEffortOptions) - that's fine, but same is better valuefields must be identical sets_UNSPECIFIEDmust mean the same thing in both- onChange: remove on
_UNSPECIFIED, set explicit value otherwise
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 64 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 40e25d6d7754
align-params-uis is a command published in the GitHub repository enricoros/big-AGI (7,114 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
lens-reviewer
Use the @lens-reviewer agent to review the following code: $ARGUMENTS.
raven-critic
Use the @raven-critic agent to critique the following plan, spec, or design: $ARGUMENTS.
zen-simplifier
Use the @zen-simplifier agent to simplify the following code without changing behavior: $ARGUMENTS.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.