Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felvieira/claude-skills-fvWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/felvieira/claude-skills-fv/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/felvieira/claude-skills-fv/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/felvieira/claude-skills-fv/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/felvieira/claude-skills-fv/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/felvieira/claude-skills-fv/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00172 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review — Review Final
Objetivo: Validação completa antes de deploy — qualidade de código, segurança, documentação e pipeline.
Skills ativadas:
- 11 — Reviewer (gate final de qualidade)
- 06 — Security Reviewer (OWASP, headers, auth, DRY)
Input esperado: Código implementado e testado, evidências de QA.
Output esperado: Relatório de aprovação ou rejeição com findings priorizados e skills responsáveis.
Policies relevantes:
policies/quality-gates.md— critérios de aprovaçãopolicies/handoffs.md— formato de entrega entre skills
Uso: /review [escopo do review ou referência ao PR/branch]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 22 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 0322b423cf6a
review is a command published in the GitHub repository felvieira/claude-skills-fv (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 172 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.