Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fergupa/claude_pluginsnpx agentmods add commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-queryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-query)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-query"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-query/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-query"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/write-query.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.01026 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00410 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
write-query scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/write-query - Write Optimized SQL
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Write a SQL query from a natural language description, optimized for your specific SQL dialect and following best practices.
Usage
/write-query <description of what data you need>
Workflow
1. Understand the Request
Parse the user's description to identify:
- Output columns: What fields should the result include?
- Filters: What conditions limit the data (time ranges, segments, statuses)?
- Aggregations: Are there GROUP BY operations, counts, sums, averages?
- Joins: Does this require combining multiple tables?
- Ordering: How should results be sorted?
- Limits: Is there a top-N or sample requirement?
2. Determine SQL Dialect
If the user's SQL dialect is not already known, ask which they use:
- PostgreSQL (including Aurora, RDS, Supabase, Neon)
- Snowflake
- BigQuery (Google Cloud)
- Redshift (Amazon)
- Databricks SQL
- MySQL (including Aurora MySQL, PlanetScale)
- SQL Server (Microsoft)
- DuckDB
- SQLite
- Other (ask for specifics)
Remember the dialect for future queries in the same session.
3. Discover Schema (If Warehouse Connected)
If a data warehouse MCP server is connected:
- Search for relevant tables based on the user's description
- Inspect column names, types, and relationships
- Check for partitioning or clustering keys that affect performance
- Look for pre-built views or materialized views that might simplify the query
4. Write the Query
Follow these best practices:
Structure:
- Use CTEs (WITH clauses) for readability when queries have multiple logical steps
- One CTE per logical transformation or data source
- Name CTEs descriptively (e.g.,
daily_signups,active_users,revenue_by_product)
Performance:
- Never use
SELECT *in production queries -- specify only needed columns - Filter early (push WHERE clauses as close to the base tables as possible)
- Use partition filters when available (especially date partitions)
- Prefer
EXISTSoverINfor subqueries with large result sets - Use appropriate JOIN types (don't use LEFT JOIN when INNER JOIN is correct)
- Avoid correlated subqueries when a JOIN or window function works
- Be mindful of exploding joins (many-to-many)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 03e0828cbc45
write-query is a command published in the GitHub repository fergupa/claude_plugins (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 1,026 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.