Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add freema/cursor-plugin-cc/plugin install cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/freema/cursor-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/freema/cursor-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/freema/cursor-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/freema/cursor-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/freema/cursor-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00782 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a read-only Cursor code review of the git diff through the shared review runtime (scripts/review.mjs).
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Cursor's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in the background. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work for auto or working-tree review even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant scope is actually empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself — pass them through untouched; the script reads them. - Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- For a steerable review that challenges the design and approach — not just implementation defects — use
/cursor:adversarial-reviewinstead. (The--adversarialflag on this command still works for backward compatibility.)
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/review.mjs" --wait -- "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is — it is a code review. Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it. If the run touched the working tree, the script surfaces a post-flight warning — keep it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Run the SAME command with
--backgroundinstead of--wait, as a normal (foreground)Bashcall —review.mjsdetaches the worker itself and returns a job id immediately, so do not setrun_in_background:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/review.mjs" --background -- "$ARGUMENTS"
- Present the returned job id and the
/cursor:status//cursor:resulthints exactly as printed. Do not poll or wait for completion in this turn.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 008ca90cbdbd
review is a command published in the GitHub repository freema/cursor-plugin-cc (36 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-package
Prepare a GitHub PR delivery package (branch, commits, PR title and body, reviewer notes) from the real git diff against an explicit base branch, persisted as PRPACKAGE.md, never inventing work outside the diff. Use when scope is done and diff is stable. Do not use mid-implementation, for a branch name (use…
mr-description-creator
Generate and apply MR/PR description directly via gh or glab CLI (project).
open-pr
Create a pull request for the current branch following the the team's standard PR template.
prp-commit
Quick commit with natural language file targeting: describe what to commit in plain English.
worktree
Manage git worktrees for isolated feature development.
create-pr
Create a pull request with proper template discovery and population.