Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-fastapi-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-fastapi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-fastapi-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
gx-fastapi-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Perform a Python code review on the provided code. Accept input in any of following forms:
- A working directory path (analyze git diff in that directory)
- A Git commit reference (analyze changes in that commit)
- A list of Python file paths (analyze those files)
- A planning document (analyze the Python files in the plan)
Ensure the FastAPI layer follows Galaxy best practices (only one needs to be checked currently):
- If there is a Python FastAPI layer, ensure we're not trying to
include_routeror register the router somehow like would typically be needed in FastAPI. We detect our routers automatically.
Galaxy has other best practices around keeping this layer thin and using type-based DI but other review commands can be used to check these.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 13 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A afbc48990078
gx-fastapi-review is a command published in the GitHub repository galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 161 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
connector-review
Review DataHub connector code for standards compliance and quality.
review-rust
Focused Rust/Tauri backend review with rust-backend-architect (Primary Owner).
api-style-review
Review SAP API style compliance for REST, OData, OpenAPI, SDK naming, documentation, and lifecycle readiness.
fec-doc-sync
Sync README, docs, environment variables, scripts, API/routing/component descriptions and deployment instructions from code and project sources of truth.
document
On-demand documentation generation — API docs, architecture updates, user guides.
api-review
Review the current code or API against API design principles — identifies violations and suggests improvements.