joplin-llm-wiki: Command for Claude Code

.cursor/commands/spectra-discuss.md

/spectra-discuss is a command for Claude Code, Cursor from gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki. It costs 17 tokens per session (3,226 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided discussion command for examining a software problem, design choice, or proposed change and ending with a decision.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to discuss architecture choices, clarify a vague feature, or decide how to approach a change without modifying production code.
Why use it?
It keeps the work focused on investigation and agreement before implementation, so unresolved questions are made explicit.

Command for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Cursor and Claude Code: installed under .cursor/, but also a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

This is gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Cursor how to work on joplin-llm-wiki itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything joplin-llm-wiki configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/main/.cursor/commands/spectra-discuss.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for /spectra-discuss

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for /spectra-discuss

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki/spectra-discuss.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,226 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.03226
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.01613
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00645
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00323

Measured 11d ago against content hash f56b04986469, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

/spectra-discuss scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/commands/spectra-discuss.md · 276 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Have a focused discussion about a topic and reach a conclusion.

IMPORTANT: Discuss mode is for thinking, not implementing. You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit discuss mode first (e.g., start a change with /spectra:propose). You MAY create Spectra artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.

This is a task-oriented discussion. Every discussion has a topic, works toward a goal, and ends with a clear conclusion. Unlike open-ended exploration, discuss mode converges.

Input: The argument after /spectra:discuss is the topic. Could be:

  • A design question: "should we use WebSockets or SSE?"
  • A problem to solve: "the auth system is getting unwieldy"
  • A change name: "add-dark-mode" (discuss in context of that change)
  • An architecture decision: "how to structure the plugin system"
  • A vague idea that needs sharpening: "real-time collaboration"

Before You Speak

Before asking anything, load the shared vocabulary, then do a quick codebase scout to decide how to run this discussion.

Step 0: Load shared vocabulary

Try to read openspec/LANGUAGE.md. This file is the project's canonical vocabulary — terms with definition, avoid, and why notes, plus principles for when legacy terminology may remain.

  • If the file exists: scan the canonical terms and their avoided synonyms. Prefer the canonical term when you summarize, capture conclusions, or update artifacts. If you notice a relevant avoid synonym in the user's topic or in the artifacts you read, plan to surface that as vocabulary drift in the conclusion.
  • If the file does not exist: continue silently with the normal flow. A missing vocabulary file is not an error; do not announce it, do not block, and do not stop to ask the user to create it.

This step runs before the codebase scout, the assumptions list, the interview questions, and the conclusion capture.

Read the full file on GitHub · 276 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 276 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f56b04986469

Subscribe to this mod's changes

/spectra-discuss is a command published in the GitHub repository gcake119/joplin-llm-wiki (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 3,226 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.