Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ghosteken/agent-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/figma-design-to-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/figma-design-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/figma-design-to-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/figma-design-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/figma-design-to-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00036 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00014 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
figma-design-to-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the agent-harness:figma-design-to-code skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · -4 lines 2b6364fa2fc7
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 903c2cd5925a
figma-design-to-code is a command published in the GitHub repository Ghosteken/agent-harness (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 36 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other commands, from other repositories
ui-ux-pro-max
You MUST start your FIRST response with this exact agent activation line.
ui-review
Retroactive visual audit of UI implementation with 1-4 scoring per dimension.
ux-recommend
The v2 flagship. Runs the 5-parallel-search Python engine across 11 data manifests (75+ styles, 170+ palettes, 65+ type pairs, 120+ components, 170+ industries, 110+ UX laws, 50+ motion presets, 120+ anti-patterns, 92 brand specs) and returns a complete recommended design system for your project — with always-on…
color-specialist
Use when colour is failing. Contrast below AA, a palette with no system behind it, dark mode that is only inverted light mode, or semantic colours that carry no meaning.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
revisar-ui
Auditoria visual retroativa de 6 pilares do código frontend implementado.