prospect

prospect is a command for coding agents from gmickel/flow-next. It costs 19 tokens per session (115 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repository-aware idea generator that produces, critiques, and ranks possible work items.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find and rank feature or improvement ideas before handing one to the planning workflow.
Why use it?
It helps turn the current state of a codebase into a prioritized list of useful candidate tasks.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/gmickel/flow-next/prospect
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gmickel/flow-next

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for prospect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gmickel/flow-next/prospect.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gmickel/flow-next/prospect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gmickel/flow-next/prospect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gmickel/flow-next/prospect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 115 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00019 $0.00115
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00057
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00023
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00012

Measured yesterday against content hash 0bc62e26d420, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

prospect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/flow-next/commands/prospect.md · 14 lines

What it actually says

IMPORTANT: This command MUST invoke the skill flow-next-prospect

The ONLY purpose of this command is to call the flow-next-prospect skill. You MUST use that skill now.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Pass the arguments to the skill. The skill handles grounding, generation, critique, ranking, artifact write, and handoff.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 14 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 0bc62e26d420

Subscribe to this mod's changes

prospect is a command published in the GitHub repository gmickel/flow-next (690 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 115 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.