Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gokulkrishh/.cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gokulkrishh/.cursor/accessibility-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gokulkrishh/.cursor/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gokulkrishh/.cursor/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gokulkrishh/.cursor/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gokulkrishh/.cursor/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00216 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Accessibility Audit
Perform comprehensive accessibility (a11y) audit of the current UI code. Review:
WCAG Compliance
- Check conformance to WCAG 2.1 guidelines (A, AA, AAA levels)
- Verify proper semantic HTML structure
- Ensure keyboard navigation support
- Review color contrast and visual accessibility
Screen Reader Support
- Validate ARIA labels and descriptions
- Check heading hierarchy and structure
- Ensure form labels and error messages are accessible
- Review dynamic content announcements
Interactive Elements
- Verify focus management and visible focus indicators
- Check tab order and keyboard shortcuts
- Ensure interactive elements are properly sized
- Review modal and dialog accessibility
Testing & Tools
- Suggest automated accessibility testing tools
- Provide manual testing procedures
- Create accessibility test cases
- Recommend browser extensions and validators
Remediation
- Provide specific code fixes for each issue
- Include ARIA attributes and semantic improvements
- Suggest alternative approaches for complex interactions
- Create accessible component patterns
Generate actionable recommendations with code examples to improve accessibility.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 94e3d422e3c8
accessibility-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository gokulkrishh/.cursor (3 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 216 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
accessibility-audit compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accessibility-auditgokulkrishh/.cursor | Command | 3 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| profilecathrynlavery/diagram-design | Command | 66k | today | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| erne-animateJubaKitiashvili/everything-react-native-expo | Command | 50 | 29d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| ui-flow-reviewMRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code | Command | 104 | today | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| responsive-design-specialistimsaif/design-with-claude | Command | 11 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| design-auditw2ur/claude-code-setup | Command | 2 | today | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| ppt-image2-editable-rebuildwwe-dog/ppt-image2-editable-rebuild | Command | 206 | 5mo ago | Unlicense | A | 15 | Claude Code |