Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/saviaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/accreditation-track)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/accreditation-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/accreditation-track/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/accreditation-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/accreditation-track.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
/accreditation-track scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- /accreditation-track — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
/accreditation-track — Seguimiento de Acreditaciones
Gestiona el cumplimiento de estándares de acreditación sanitaria.
Sintaxis
/accreditation-track <subcommand> [opciones]
Subcomandos
standard
Definir un estándar de acreditación.
/accreditation-track standard \
--nombre "JCI" \
--version "6.3" \
--sector "hospital" \
--requisitos 280
Estándares soportados:
- JCI — Joint Commission International
- EFQM — European Foundation Quality Management
- ISO 9001 — Gestión de calidad
- ISO 15189 — Laboratorio clínico
evidence
Vincular evidencia a requisito.
/accreditation-track evidence \
--standard "JCI" \
--requirement "ACC.1.1" \
--documento "protocols/medication-safety.pdf" \
--revisor "Jefe Calidad" \
--fecha "2026-03-05"
Estados: aceptada|revisión|rechazada|vencida
gap
Identificar requisitos sin evidencia.
/accreditation-track gap --standard "ISO 15189"
Muestra:
- Requisitos sin evidencia
- Evidencias vencidas (>12 meses)
- Documentos desactualizados
status
Mostrar cumplimiento por estándar.
/accreditation-track status --standard "JCI"
Resumen:
- % Requisitos cubiertos
- % Evidencias vigentes
- % Conforme/No conforme
- Próxima auditoría
export
Generar reporte de acreditación.
/accreditation-track export --standard "ISO 9001" --formato "pdf"
Incluye:
- Matriz de cumplimiento
- Hallazgos por requisito
- Plan de mejora
- Firma revisores
Almacenamiento
projects/{proyecto}/quality/accreditation/
jci-status.yml
iso-15189-evidence/
efqm-gaps.md
Ciclo de auditoría
Pre-auditoría → audit-track gap → revisar evidencias Durante → registrar findings Post → crear acciones para no-conformidades
Vigencia de evidencias
- Documentos: 12 meses
- Procedimientos: 24 meses
- Registros de cumplimiento: 12 meses
- Auditorías internas: 12 meses
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 119 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A a31b3d6d46f2
/accreditation-track is a command published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/savia (50 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
change-order
Draft change order documentation with scope changes, cost impacts, schedule adjustments, and approval routing.
wtfp:contribute
Guide a bounded WTF-P contribution from branch creation through a reviewable change request.
sow
Generate Statement of Work (SOW) / RFP document for vendor procurement.
project-brief
Convert a technical spec into a PM/CTO-readable executive summary. Simplify technical details, focus on business value.
hive
Query and manage swarm tasks (cells).
status
Check swarm coordination status - workers, messages, reservations.