Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/accreditation-track)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/accreditation-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/accreditation-track/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/accreditation-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/accreditation-track.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
/accreditation-track scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to /accreditation-track — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
/accreditation-track — Seguimiento de Acreditaciones
Gestiona el cumplimiento de estándares de acreditación sanitaria.
Sintaxis
/accreditation-track <subcommand> [opciones]
Subcomandos
standard
Definir un estándar de acreditación.
/accreditation-track standard \
--nombre "JCI" \
--version "6.3" \
--sector "hospital" \
--requisitos 280
Estándares soportados:
- JCI — Joint Commission International
- EFQM — European Foundation Quality Management
- ISO 9001 — Gestión de calidad
- ISO 15189 — Laboratorio clínico
evidence
Vincular evidencia a requisito.
/accreditation-track evidence \
--standard "JCI" \
--requirement "ACC.1.1" \
--documento "protocols/medication-safety.pdf" \
--revisor "Jefe Calidad" \
--fecha "2026-03-05"
Estados: aceptada|revisión|rechazada|vencida
gap
Identificar requisitos sin evidencia.
/accreditation-track gap --standard "ISO 15189"
Muestra:
- Requisitos sin evidencia
- Evidencias vencidas (>12 meses)
- Documentos desactualizados
status
Mostrar cumplimiento por estándar.
/accreditation-track status --standard "JCI"
Resumen:
- % Requisitos cubiertos
- % Evidencias vigentes
- % Conforme/No conforme
- Próxima auditoría
export
Generar reporte de acreditación.
/accreditation-track export --standard "ISO 9001" --formato "pdf"
Incluye:
- Matriz de cumplimiento
- Hallazgos por requisito
- Plan de mejora
- Firma revisores
Almacenamiento
projects/{proyecto}/quality/accreditation/
jci-status.yml
iso-15189-evidence/
efqm-gaps.md
Ciclo de auditoría
Pre-auditoría → audit-track gap → revisar evidencias Durante → registrar findings Post → crear acciones para no-conformidades
Vigencia de evidencias
- Documentos: 12 meses
- Procedimientos: 24 meses
- Registros de cumplimiento: 12 meses
- Auditorías internas: 12 meses
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 119 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A a31b3d6d46f2
/accreditation-track is a command published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace (49 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to /accreditation-track, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
sign
Sign a PDF — stamp a signature block (name + date, or a PNG signature) on a signed copy.
pipeline-minutar-pdf
Pipeline completo de sentença judicial a partir de PDF (conversão, linha-tempo, relatório, análise, fundamentação, merge).
lawsuit-analysis
A command that analyses legal case documents and produces a structured, self-contained HTML report. It can organise people, claims, responses, evidence, and events from documents such as complaints or briefs.
template-fill
A command that fills registered spreadsheet legal templates with information extracted from PDFs or images. It can use documents from the current case and shared template locations.
legal-risk
Analyze sourced covenant clauses and merger-agreement MAC/MAE language with page-level quotes and risk classification.
arckit.fr-marche-public
You are helping an enterprise architect generate French public procurement documentation (Dossier de Consultation des Entreprises) aligned with the Code de la Commande Publique, UGAP, and DINUM digital doctrine requirements.