Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/legal-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/legal-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/legal-risk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/legal-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/legal-risk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
legal-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Covenant + MAC/MAE Risk
Use this workflow when a forensic review needs sourced legal-risk analysis in addition to the accounting battery.
- Call
mcp__ololand__list_deal_documents(deal_id)and identify the credit agreement/loan documents and merger agreement. - Retrieve the raw clause text with
mcp__ololand__grep_filingormcp__ololand__search_deal_documents; do not pass an LLM summary. - Call
mcp__ololand__analyze_covenants(text)for leverage, coverage, cross-default, and other covenant terms. Preserve each returnedsource_quote. - Call
mcp__ololand__analyze_mac_mae(text)on the raw MAC/MAE provision. Preservesource_quotes, carve-outs, scope, and risk assessment. - Report the deal risk level, exact source quotes/page references, and any missing or insufficient text. These analyzers are deterministic text-in/dict-out MCP tools and do not finalize legal conclusions.
Guardrails
- Source every clause from the deal corpus before analysis; never invent covenant or MAC/MAE terms.
- Keep accounting findings and legal-clause findings separate, then explain their interaction (for example, a covenant breach plus a broad MAC/MAE carve-out).
- This workflow does not approve patches, IC packages, or document versions; those approvals are app/human-session only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 21 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a1ba7860d3d9
legal-risk is a command published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 329 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
sign
Sign a PDF — stamp a signature block (name + date, or a PNG signature) on a signed copy.
pipeline-minutar-pdf
Pipeline completo de sentença judicial a partir de PDF (conversão, linha-tempo, relatório, análise, fundamentação, merge).
lawsuit-analysis
A command that analyses legal case documents and produces a structured, self-contained HTML report. It can organise people, claims, responses, evidence, and events from documents such as complaints or briefs.
template-fill
A command that fills registered spreadsheet legal templates with information extracted from PDFs or images. It can use documents from the current case and shared template locations.
arckit.fr-marche-public
You are helping an enterprise architect generate French public procurement documentation (Dossier de Consultation des Entreprises) aligned with the Code de la Commande Publique, UGAP, and DINUM digital doctrine requirements.
arckit.tcop
Generate a Technology Code of Practice (TCoP) review document for a UK Government technology project.