Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HelixDevelopment/code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HelixDevelopment/code/main/.specify/extensions/superspec/commands/execute.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HelixDevelopment/codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/execute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/execute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/execute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00237 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
speckit.superspec.execute
Orchestrate implementation with TDD, subagents, and review gates.
Usage
/speckit.superspec.execute [spec-number|spec-path]
Process
-
Read the tasks file for the target feature
-
Read the plan and constitution for context
-
Superpowers detection: Check for
executing-plans,subagent-driven-development, andtest-driven-developmentskills -
Walk through tasks phase by phase:
For
[TDD]tasks:- If TDD skill found, follow its RED-GREEN-REFACTOR process
- Otherwise: write test → verify it fails → implement → verify it passes → refactor
For
[SUBAGENT]tasks:- If subagent-driven-development skill found, follow its dispatch protocol
- Otherwise: implement sequentially in-session
For
[P]tasks:- Launch parallel tasks where possible using the Task tool
For
[REVIEW]tasks:- Pause and run review protocol (see
commands/review.md)
-
At each phase checkpoint:
- Summarize completed work
- Run tests if applicable
- Ask user for approval before proceeding to next phase
-
Update task checkboxes in
tasks.mdas each task completes -
Update
specs/NNN/progress.ymlwith current execution state
Output
Code changes in the project, updated task checkboxes in tasks.md.
Human Checkpoints
The agent MUST pause at every phase boundary and wait for explicit user approval. Never skip a checkpoint.
Superpowers Adaptation
| Skill | Adaptation |
|---|---|
executing-plans |
Follow its batch processing protocol with human checkpoints |
subagent-driven-development |
Follow its dispatch protocol for [SUBAGENT] tasks |
test-driven-development |
Follow its RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline for [TDD] tasks |
If no superpowers are available, all three fall back to built-in sequential execution
with manual confirmation. See references/superpowers-bridge.md for full details.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 60 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5f1530527c3d
execute is a command published in the GitHub repository HelixDevelopment/code (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 474 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
trellis-continue
Resume work on the current task — pick up at the right phase/step in .trellis/workflow.md.
trellis-finish-work
Wrap up the current session: archive the active task (and any other completed-but-unarchived tasks the user wants to clean up) and record the session journal. Code commits are NOT done here — those happen in workflow Phase 3.4 before you invoke this command.
status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
dashboard-session-fork
Fork a session into a new one. Usage /dashboard:session-fork.
dashboard-session-hide
Hide a session from the dashboard list. Usage /dashboard:session-hide.
roadmap-track.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.