Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HelixDevelopment/code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HelixDevelopment/code/main/.specify/extensions/superspec/commands/tasks.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HelixDevelopment/codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00471 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00235 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
speckit.superspec.tasks
Generate a phased task breakdown using writing-plans skills.
Usage
/speckit.superspec.tasks [spec-number|spec-path]
Process
- Read the spec, plan, and constitution for the target feature
- Read the template at
.specify/templates/tasks-template.md - Superpowers detection: Check for
writing-plansskill- If found: Read the writing-plans SKILL.md and follow its task decomposition process, adapting outputs to the tasks template structure
- If not found: Decompose directly from the plan using the template
- Organize tasks by phase: Setup → Foundational → User Stories (by priority) → Polish
- Apply execution markers to each task:
[P]— can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)[TDD]— must follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline[REVIEW]— requires code review before proceeding[SUBAGENT]— can be delegated to a subagent
- Define phase dependencies and checkpoint gates
- Write to
specs/NNN-feature-name/tasks.md
Output
specs/NNN-feature-name/tasks.md with phased task breakdown.
Execution Markers
| Marker | Meaning | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
[P] |
Parallel | Can run concurrently with other [P] tasks |
[TDD] |
Test-Driven | Must follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR: write test → fail → implement → pass |
[REVIEW] |
Review Gate | Pause for human code review before proceeding |
[SUBAGENT] |
Subagent | Can be dispatched to a parallel subagent |
Superpowers Adaptation
When using the writing-plans skill, adapt its outputs:
- Implementation blueprints → merge into
specs/NNN/tasks.mdusing template structure - Task dependencies → map to the Dependencies section
- Parallel opportunities → mark with
[P]and[SUBAGENT]
See references/superpowers-bridge.md for full adaptation rules.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 49 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c0fc60296bbc
tasks is a command published in the GitHub repository HelixDevelopment/code (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 471 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
trellis-continue
Resume work on the current task — pick up at the right phase/step in .trellis/workflow.md.
trellis-finish-work
Wrap up the current session: archive the active task (and any other completed-but-unarchived tasks the user wants to clean up) and record the session journal. Code commits are NOT done here — those happen in workflow Phase 3.4 before you invoke this command.
status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
dashboard-session-fork
Fork a session into a new one. Usage /dashboard:session-fork.
dashboard-session-hide
Hide a session from the dashboard list. Usage /dashboard:session-hide.
roadmap-track.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.