Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.00147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load the ck:test skill and run it with $ARGUMENTS.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 6 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A e653d42e14a2
test is a command published in the GitHub repository huuanh20/awesome-ai-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 147 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
test
Run TDD workflow — write failing tests, implement, verify. For bugs, use the Prove-It pattern.
workflow-implement
Exécuter la phase d'Implémentation - développement sprint avec TDD/BDD.
tdd
Correction de Bug en Mode TDD/BDD.
fix
Correction automatisee des bugs identifies par la QA Recette.
final-review
Command "final-review" from adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai, covering final review - comprehensive pr review & testing, step 0: determine review pass, step 1: create or update the pr, step 2: launch three review agents in parallel and agent 1: codebase consistency reviewer.
run-all-tests-and-fix
Execute the full test suite and systematically fix any failures, ensuring code quality and functionality.