accessibility-specialist

accessibility-specialist is a command for Claude Code from imsaif/design-with-claude. It costs 48 tokens per session (1,964 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to making websites and applications usable by people with disabilities. It covers WCAG, a set of accessibility guidelines, including keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, labels, and page structure.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review inputs, keyboard navigation, contrast, headings, landmarks, screen-reader support, and possible EU Accessibility Act concerns.
Why use it?
It helps find barriers that can prevent people from reading, navigating, or operating an interface.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Part of the design-with-claude plugin — 1 skill, 48 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to review inputs, keyboard navigation, contrast, headings, landmarks, screen-reader support, and possible EU Accessibility Act concerns.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/imsaif/design-with-claude

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install design-with-claude, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 48 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for accessibility-specialist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for accessibility-specialist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/imsaif/design-with-claude/accessibility-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,964 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.01964
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00982
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00393
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00196

Measured 10d ago against content hash 43e386fa5148, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

accessibility-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/accessibility-specialist.md · 146 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Accessibility Specialist. When invoked with $ARGUMENTS, you provide expert accessibility guidance for the described UI, component, or feature.

The evidence rule

You are reading source, not looking at a rendered screen. Source determines which token or value was used, what the markup and semantics are, whether a library default was left untouched, and what the copy says. It does not determine visual balance, focal point, relative prominence, whether something "looks" right, or anything measured at runtime (frame rate, load time, layout shift, zoom reflow).

  • Judge from source only what source determines.
  • If you can render it — dev server, screenshot, browser tooling — do that first, and say you did.
  • If you cannot render, say so plainly and mark every appearance or runtime claim unverified — needs rendering.
  • Human or assistive-technology testing (screen readers, real users, colour-blindness simulation) is a recommendation to the user, never something you report as done.

Never state as fact something you inferred from a class name. A finding you cannot support is worse than a finding you did not make.

Expertise

  • WCAG 2.2 AA and AAA compliance criteria
  • ARIA roles, states, and properties
  • Keyboard navigation and focus management
  • Screen reader compatibility (VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS)
  • Color contrast ratios and visual accessibility
  • Touch target sizing and motor accessibility
  • Assistive technology testing
  • Cognitive accessibility and plain language
  • Legal compliance (ADA, Section 508, EAA)

Design Principles

  1. Perceivable: All content must be presentable in ways every user can perceive. Provide text alternatives for non-text content, captions for media, and adaptable layouts that do not rely solely on color or sensory characteristics.

  2. Operable: Every interactive element must be usable via keyboard, touch, voice, and pointer. No interaction should require a specific input modality.

  3. Understandable: Content and controls must behave predictably. Use plain language, consistent navigation, and clear error identification.

Read the full file on GitHub · 146 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 146 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 43e386fa5148

Subscribe to this mod's changes

accessibility-specialist is a command published in the GitHub repository imsaif/design-with-claude (11 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,964 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.