harness:proposal-pitch

harness:proposal-pitch is a command for Claude Code from Intense-Visions/harness-engineering. It costs 104 tokens per session (524 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A draft-first proposal workflow for turning a source such as a chat, issue, or document into proposed pages. It agrees on the page structure, creates visual concept images, and publishes the result as drafts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to shape proposal content, create concept stills, publish draft pages, and report which claims or decisions remain open.
Why use it?
It separates agreement and review from publishing, reducing the risk of building the wrong proposal or replacing current pages too early.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the harness-claude plugin — 85 skills, 89 commands, 16 agents, 4 hooks, 4 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Use it to shape proposal content, create concept stills, publish draft pages, and report which claims or decisions remain open.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install harness-claude, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 85 skills, 89 commands, 16 agents, 4 hooks, 4 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for harness:proposal-pitch

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for harness:proposal-pitch

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/intense-visions/harness-engineering/proposal-pitch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 524 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00104 $0.00524
Opus 5 $0.00052 $0.00262
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00105
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00052

Measured 5d ago against content hash 4c3c7d67498b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

harness:proposal-pitch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude-plugin/commands/proposal-pitch.md · 43 lines

What it actually says

Phases:

  • gather-source: Collect the source (chat, issue, or doc) and identify what is settled vs open
  • agree-structure: Agree the page structure with the author BEFORE building anything
  • render-stills: Render concept stills, invoking the docs-publish surface (the harness docs-publish CLI / docs_publish MCP tool) for the mechanics
  • publish-drafts: Publish pages as DRAFTS only via the docs-publish surface; surface any manual attach-media step to the human; never move a draft to current
  • close-the-loop: Report back on the source with what was built, epistemic labels on every claim, and what remains open

<execution_context> @agents/skills/claude-code/proposal-pitch/SKILL.md @agents/skills/claude-code/proposal-pitch/skill.yaml </execution_context>

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 43 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 4c3c7d67498b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

harness:proposal-pitch is a command published in the GitHub repository Intense-Visions/harness-engineering (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 524 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.