Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isaacsight/kernelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/isaacsight/kernel/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/isaacsight/kernel/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/isaacsight/kernel/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/isaacsight/kernel/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/isaacsight/kernel/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00030 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Type-check and verify the project builds cleanly.
Steps:
- Run TypeScript type-checking:
npx tsc --noEmit - Run a production build:
npm run build - If both pass, the project is healthy.
There are no unit test suites. Integration tests in tools/ require a running Supabase instance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b4e641822c5f
test is a command published in the GitHub repository isaacsight/kernel (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 74 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
test compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| testisaacsight/kernel | Command | 16 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| create-prdesplega-ai/agent-swarm | Command | 1.0k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| riskreviewinclusionAI/Avernet | Command | 601 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| anchorsraccioly/docguard | Command | 32 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| initraccioly/docguard | Command | 32 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| briefraccioly/docguard | Command | 32 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| scriptwriter-opencambridgetcg/agenttool | Command | 0 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 47 | Claude Code |