Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00345 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generate a summary report from existing kaizen analysis files. Does not run new analysis — reads previously generated findings.
Arguments
--latest— Summarize only the most recent analysis file. Default behavior when no flag provided.--all— Aggregate findings across all analysis files in.planning/kaizen/.
Execution Steps
-
Find analysis files. Glob for
.planning/kaizen/analysis-*.mdand.planning/kaizen/exploration-*.md. -
Select scope. With
--latest, use the most recent file by date. With--all, read all files. -
Extract findings. From each analysis file, extract:
- Anti-patterns with frequency counts
- Severity distribution (critical / warning / info)
- Affected sessions
- Recommended improvement types
-
Generate summary report. Write to
.planning/kaizen/report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.mdwith:- Executive summary — top 5 findings by frequency × impact
- Trend analysis (if
--all) — are patterns improving or worsening over time? - Improvement backlog — prioritized list of proposed changes
- Metrics — total sessions analyzed, total findings, breakdown by dimension
-
Display key findings. Show the executive summary to the user inline.
Output
Report written to .planning/kaizen/report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 06564c16756c
report is a command published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (67 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 345 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
report compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reportJamie-BitFlight/claude_skills | Command | 67 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |