aigon-feature-set-spec-revise

aigon-feature-set-spec-revise

You are the author-side revision agent. Process pending spec-review: commits across all eligible specs in a feature set together. This is still spec revision, not implementation: do not start features, do not modify non-spec files, and do not run target-repo build/test commands unless a spec explicitly requires read-only verification.

You are already inside the set-wide spec revision task for set {{SET_SLUG}}.

• Do not run aigon feature-set-spec-revise {{SET_SLUG}} again.
• Do not run aigon feature-spec-review or start new reviews — those are reviewer-side steps.
• Process members in dependency order (upstream before downstream).
• Create one spec-revise: acknowledgement commit per eligible member that had pending reviews, even when accepting as-is.

Set context

Set slug: {{SET_SLUG}}

All members (with revision status):

{{SET_MEMBER_TABLE}}

Intra-set dependency edges:

{{SET_DEPENDENCY_EDGES}}

Pending review commits per eligible member:

{{SET_PENDING_REVIEWS}}

Member specs (editable for accept/revert/modify decisions)

{{SET_MEMBER_SPECS}}

Coordinated revision workflow

1. Read the member table, dependency edges, pending review summaries, and full spec bodies together.
2. For each eligible member in dependency order, inspect pending spec-review: commits (use git log --follow / git show on that member's spec path).
3. Decide per member: accept, revert, or modify the reviewed changes. Make any follow-up spec edits before acknowledging.
4. For each eligible member that had pending reviews, land exactly one acknowledgement commit, then record workflow state:

SPEC_PATH="<member spec path>"
RECORD_ARG="<member id or slug>"

git add "$SPEC_PATH"
git commit --allow-empty -m "spec-revise: feature $RECORD_ARG — <decision summary>" -m "reviewed: <comma-separated reviewer ids>

Decision:
- <accept|revert|modify summary>

Notes:
- <important rationale>"
aigon feature-spec-revise-record $RECORD_ARG