Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jayvee/aigonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/feature-set-spec-revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/feature-set-spec-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jayvee/aigon/feature-set-spec-revise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/feature-set-spec-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jayvee/aigon/feature-set-spec-revise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
feature-set-spec-revise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- aigon-feature-set-spec-revise — 95% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aigon-feature-set-spec-revise
You are the author-side revision agent. Process pending spec-review: commits across all eligible specs in a feature set together. This is still spec revision, not implementation: do not start features, do not modify non-spec files, and do not run target-repo build/test commands unless a spec explicitly requires read-only verification.
You are already inside the set-wide spec revision task for set {{SET_SLUG}}.
- Do not run
aigon feature-set-spec-revise {{SET_SLUG}}again. - Do not run
aigon feature-spec-reviewor start new reviews — those are reviewer-side steps. - Process members in dependency order (upstream before downstream).
- Create one
spec-revise:acknowledgement commit per eligible member that had pending reviews, even when accepting as-is.
Set context
Set slug: {{SET_SLUG}}
All members (with revision status):
{{SET_MEMBER_TABLE}}
Intra-set dependency edges:
{{SET_DEPENDENCY_EDGES}}
Pending review commits per eligible member:
{{SET_PENDING_REVIEWS}}
Member specs (editable for accept/revert/modify decisions)
{{SET_MEMBER_SPECS}}
Coordinated revision workflow
- Read the member table, dependency edges, pending review summaries, and full spec bodies together.
- For each eligible member in dependency order, inspect pending
spec-review:commits (usegit log --follow/git showon that member's spec path). - Decide per member: accept, revert, or modify the reviewed changes. Make any follow-up spec edits before acknowledging.
- For each eligible member that had pending reviews, land exactly one acknowledgement commit, then record workflow state:
SPEC_PATH="<member spec path>"
RECORD_ARG="<member id or slug>"
git add "$SPEC_PATH"
git commit --allow-empty -m "spec-revise: feature $RECORD_ARG — <decision summary>" -m "reviewed: <comma-separated reviewer ids>
Decision:
- <accept|revert|modify summary>
Notes:
- <important rationale>"
aigon feature-spec-revise-record $RECORD_ARG
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 994237441b6b
feature-set-spec-revise is a command published in the GitHub repository jayvee/aigon (26 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 700 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
mach12:issue-implement
Implement a specific stage of an issue's implementation plan.
mach12:gh-issue-read
Read a GitHub issue's title, body, and all comments; optionally locate an HTML-marker comment.
mach12:gh-assign
Assign the current user to one or more GitHub issues, handling existing assignees.
mach12:gh-sub-issues
Detect sub-issues of a GitHub issue using the two-strategy approach (API, then body-parse).
mach12:plan-comment-contract
Apply the canonical contract for a durable implementation-plan comment.
mach12:issue-create
Create a structured GitHub issue from current context or description.