Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/jonase47/ccpr/p5-review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccprWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p5-review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p5-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p5-review-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00568 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
p5-review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/p5-review-code – Check Code Quality
Checks code for quality, clean code, logic errors and test coverage. Delivers review findings with severity level.
Argument: $ARGUMENTS = [File/module/feature name]
If provided: Review the named code area. If not provided: Ask which code should be reviewed.
Prerequisites
- Feature implemented (after
/p5-impl-refactoror directly after implementation)
Agent
- Type: code-reviewer
- Model: sonnet
Context (Orchestrator prepares)
Orchestrator reads beforehand and provides inline:
- From src/: the code to be reviewed (affected files/functions only)
- From tests/: the corresponding tests
- From ARCHITECTURE.md: relevant architecture guidelines (affected section only)
Prompt Template
Goal: Code review for: [Feature/Module]
Code: [inline from src/]
Tests: [inline from tests/]
Output Format: Table with max. 15 findings:
# Severity Area Finding Suggestion 1 CRITICAL/HIGH/NOTE File:Line Description Fix suggestion Overall rating: MERGE-READY | MERGE-AFTER-FIXES | REWORK
Constraints:
- Only check code quality, logic, tests – NO security analysis (separate sub-skill)
- Severity levels: CRITICAL (merge blocker), HIGH (should be fixed), NOTE (optional)
- No style nitpicks if code conventions are followed
Orchestrator Checkpoint
- Findings are concrete and traceable?
- Severity levels assigned consistently?
- Overall rating matches the findings?
Output
- Review findings as table (documented in SPRINT.md or reviews/)
Handover Epilog
Update docs/HANDOVER.md:
- What was created/changed
- Open decisions → the
## Open Decisionstable; a finding outside this command's scope goes to the## Open Pointsinbox instead - Next Steps (according to
~/.claude/docs/NEXT_STEPS_REFERENCE.md)
Recommend 1-3 sensible next commands to the user:
- Read
docs/HANDOVER.mdfor the current project status - Consult
~/.claude/docs/NEXT_STEPS_REFERENCE.mdfor allowed transitions - Only suggest commands that match the current phase/sub-skill status
- If the current phase appears complete: recommend the gate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 67 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4a65350dc6ae
p5-review-code is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 568 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
wiki-tune
Tune wiki schema and conventions interactively.
listen
Show what a given agent should read before coding, plus briefs/approvals mentioning it.
pseo-init
Use when: kullanıcı "yeni proje", "init", "proje kur", "yeni domain ekle", "scaffold" gibi ifadeler kullanır ya da /pseo-init çağırırsa. Also use when: portföye yeni bir SEO projesi alındı, projects/{slug}/ klasörü ve project.config.json dosyasının schemaya uygun ilk hâli üretilecek; brief'te slug + domain + market…
forge-insights
Analyze past sessions for error patterns, file activity, and recommendations.
forge-context-status
Report on current context window usage, cache health, and compaction recommendation. Read-only — does not compact.
CLAUDE
Each subdirectory is one engine verb dispatched by ../cli/cli.ts: / .ts exports a pure handler that resolves the vault, does its work through ../core/ primitives, and returns its own typed report. Commands stay thin — they compose core checks and builders; they do not reimplement them. The canonical output schema is…