Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/katalon-labs/true-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/katalon-labs/true-skills/test-reporting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/katalon-labs/true-skills/test-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/katalon-labs/true-skills/test-reporting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/katalon-labs/true-skills/test-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/katalon-labs/true-skills/test-reporting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00177 | $0.05862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00088 | $0.02931 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.01172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00586 |
Grade A, and why
test-reporting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 342 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Katalon Test Reporting
Use this skill when someone outside QA asks a question about quality and the answer has to survive being asked where it came from. It reads the analyze stage and feeds the plan stage. The output is an answer with the named specifics behind it, never a metric dump. release-analyze judges one release; this skill reports the direction across several and writes what a manager says out loud.
Availability Boundary
State the boundary before promising a report, because most of what "reporting" normally means is not an MCP call.
- Available via MCP. The metric surface:
fetch_requirement_data(coverage status),fetch_test_case_data(case quality signals),fetch_test_stability_data(flakiness),fetch_test_configuration_data(configuration coverage),fetch_defect_data(defect status and context),find_test_results/read_execution/read_execution_test_results(execution history, and the only data that carries its own dates),find_iterations(the period spine), andlist_projects/list_repositories/find_test_suites/read_test_suite/find_test_casesto establish what each number is counted over. - Not directly available, and no tool exists to add.
- No trend or aggregation tool. Nothing in the MCP returns a series, an average, or a delta. Every trend here is assembled by looping periods yourself.
- No point-in-time read. Every
fetch_*_datatool returns current state. You cannot ask what requirement coverage was at release 3.0. Only execution records carry dates. - No dashboard, chart, or report entity. Dashboards are a TestOps UI surface. This skill writes text and a snapshot file, nothing else.
- No publishing surface. The MCP cannot post to Slack, Confluence, email, or a deck. Hand the written brief back to the user and let them place it.
- No Release or Build entity. Bind periods to iterations via
find_iterations, or to explicit date ranges. Never to a release object. - No escaped-defect flag.
fetch_defect_datareturns status and context, not whether a defect reached production. Ask the user which ALM field classifies it. If there is none, report "defects opened after the release run" and label it as a proxy. - No effort, cost, headcount, or cycle-time data. That is the
test-estimationgap. Say so and stop. Never estimate effort from test counts. - No custom fields or tags. Any team dimension (component, squad, product line) has to come from folder or suite structure, or from the user.
- The workaround that makes trending real. A snapshot file written on every run, plus the execution-dated series that needs no snapshot. See
references/snapshot-and-trend.md. The first run establishes a baseline and says so instead of inferring a direction.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 342 lines · 177 tokens per session scan A 693117aee6d2
test-reporting is a command published in the GitHub repository katalon-labs/true-skills (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 177 tokens to every session and 5,862 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
test-review
Act as a software quality engineer and python expert.
run_tests
Use the text the user typed after the command name as the request for this command.
write-unit-tests
Create comprehensive unit tests for the current code and generate the test file with proper imports and setup according to the project's testing conventions.
test
Command "test" from duongductrong/cursor-kit, covering purpose, analyze, test categories, output and rule.
implement_tests
Use the text the user typed after the command name as the request for this command.