Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koolamusic/claudefilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/gitcommit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/gitcommit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/gitcommit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/gitcommit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/gitcommit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00831 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
gitcommit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Git status: !
git status --short - Staged changes: !
git diff --cached --stat - Unstaged changes: !
git diff --stat - Full diff: !
git diff HEAD - Recent commits: !
git log --oneline -5
Your task
- Check if there are changes to commit; if none, inform the user and stop
- Review the diff for sensitive data (API keys, passwords, .env files) — warn if found
- Analyze changes to understand the nature and purpose
- Generate 3 commit message candidates per the Message format section below
- Present candidates to the user and ask which to use (or suggest edits)
- Stage unstaged changes if user confirms
- Execute
git commitwith the selected message - If pre-commit hooks fail, report the error and offer to fix
Message format
Conventional Commits. Why over what — the diff already shows what changed. Match project convention (use the recent-commits context above to detect capitalization, scope style, and trailer usage).
Subject line
- Format:
<type>(<scope>): <imperative summary>— scope optional - Append
!after type/scope to mark a breaking change:feat(api)!:orfeat!: - Imperative mood: "add", "fix", "remove" — not "added", "adds", "adding"
- ≤50 chars when possible, hard cap 72
- No trailing period
Types
feat— new featurefix— bug fixrefactor— code restructuring without behavior changeperf— performance improvementdocs— documentationtest— testschore— maintenance, tooling, depsbuild— build system, packagingci— CI configurationstyle— formatting, whitespacerevert— reverts a prior commit
Body
- Skip when the subject is self-explanatory
- Add when the why isn't obvious from the diff
- Wrap at 72 chars; bullets
-not* - Reference issues/PRs at end as trailers:
Closes #42,Refs #17
Mandatory body (regardless of how obvious it seems): breaking changes, security fixes, data migrations, reverts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 100 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A b4e7ac2fc5ed
gitcommit is a command published in the GitHub repository koolamusic/claudefiles (130 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 831 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
standup
Review my git commits from the past workday and generate a standup summary.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
commit
A command that examines staged Git changes and proposes a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, such as feat, fix, or docs. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.
session-report
Capture what changed this session and why, scoped to the current branch. Read by ship verbs when synthesizing the commit message; deleted after a successful commit.
git-workflow
Run review, tests, and commit steps, then prepare a pull request.
commit
Context-aware Git commit assistant with smart pre-commit checks.