Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lalitnayyar/finallyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lalitnayyar/finally/ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lalitnayyar/finally/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lalitnayyar/finally/ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lalitnayyar/finally/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lalitnayyar/finally/ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00264 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
gsd:ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
<execution_context> @/home/lnayyar/projects/CourseAIVibeCodeUdmey/finally/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/ui-review.md @/home/lnayyar/projects/CourseAIVibeCodeUdmey/finally/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md </execution_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 33 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 4160237a2722
gsd:ui-review is a command published in the GitHub repository lalitnayyar/finally (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 264 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
profile
Save, load, inspect, update, reset, or delete diagram-design client profiles.
erne-animate
ERNE — Implement animations using the ui-designer agent with Reanimated and Gesture Handler.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
design-audit
Audit the rendered design of live sites. Evidence capture first, then one critique per site. Argument is a URL, a repo name, or all.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.