speckit.specify

speckit.specify is a command for Claude Code from landim32/awesome-ai-skills. It costs 13 tokens per session (3,427 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of specify, MIT.

A command that turns a plain-language feature idea into a written specification, or updates an existing one.

In plain words
What is it for?
Starting or revising feature specifications from user requirements, including projects with optional pre-specification hooks.
Why use it?
It gives the team a structured description of what to build before implementation and checks configured extension steps first.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Part of the awesome-ai-skills plugin — 36 skills, 11 commands, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit Starting or revising feature specifications from user requirements, including projects with optional pre-specification hooks.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/landim32/awesome-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install awesome-ai-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 36 skills, 11 commands, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit.specify

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit.specify

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/landim32/awesome-ai-skills/speckit.specify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,427 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 84% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.03427
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.01714
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00685
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00343

Measured 11d ago against content hash f75a5652f234, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit.specify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

84% identical to specify — 173 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/speckit.specify.md · 307 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 307 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Pre-Execution Checks

Check for extension hooks (before specification):

  • Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_specify key
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
      
  • If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently

Outline

The text the user typed after /speckit.specify in the triggering message is the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if $ARGUMENTS appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.

Given that feature description, do this:

  1. Generate a concise short name (2-4 words) for the branch:
    • Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
    • Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
    • Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
    • Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
    • Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
    • Examples:
      • "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
      • "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
      • "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
      • "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"

Read the full file on GitHub · 307 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 307 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A f75a5652f234

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit.specify is a command published in the GitHub repository landim32/awesome-ai-skills (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 3,427 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to specify, differing in 173 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other commands, from other repositories

skill-safety

Hostile audit of coding-agent configuration the project installed rather than wrote: skills, subagents, commands, plugins, hooks, and rule files obtained from a marketplace, a git URL, a gist, or a teammate. Assume every installed instruction file is attacker-authored until read, and that the attacker's goal is to be…

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens

cr

Tool-driven implementation of unresolved PR/MR review comments on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket: fetch every comment thread plus the out-of-thread notices (review bodies, bot summaries), evaluate each for technical validity, implement valid ones one at a time with a full validation pass after each, and scan the codebase…

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens

_conventions

Read this file before executing any command file. Every rule here applies to every command unless the command file explicitly overrides it.

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens

reliability

Hostile audit of behavior when a dependency fails, a call is retried, or a message is redelivered: assume every retry double-applies, every external call hangs forever, and every crash lands in the worst window — then prove where. A call that is idempotent, bounded, timed-out, and backed-off survives; anything else is…

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens

agent-rules

Audits the project's agent rule configuration end-to-end: validates every rule file, classifies every rule in the root instruction file as correctly placed or misplaced, and generates concrete new-rule suggestions from audit artifacts and project conventions. Assume every rule file has defects until proven otherwise.

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens

cache

Hostile audit of caching correctness: assume every cache serves stale data after a write, shares a key across entities that must not share one, grows without bound, and stampedes on expiry — then prove where. A cache is a correctness liability until its key, its invalidation, its bound, and its expiry behavior are all…

ivuorinen/skills · 0 tokens