bug-fix

A bug-fixing workflow that records the problem in GitHub, creates a separate Git branch for the change, tests the fix, and prepares it for review. A Git branch is an isolated copy of the code changes, while a pull request is a proposed change for teammates to review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate a reported bug, track it as a GitHub issue, implement and test the solution on its own branch, then push the branch and open a linked pull request.
Why use it?
It keeps bug work traceable and separate from the main codebase. The linked issue, branch, tests, commit, and pull request create a clear path from reported problem to reviewed fix.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/lifangda/claude-plugins/bug-fix
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lifangda/claude-plugins
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 136 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00026 $0.00136
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00068
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00027
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00014

Measured 2d ago against content hash dd94b2db1d5a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bug-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

  • bug-fix — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
backups/legacy_backup_20251015/claude-code-marketplace-main/plugins/bug-fix/commands/bug-fix.md · 19 lines

What it actually says

Understand the bug: $ARG

Before Starting:

  • GITHUB: create a issue with the a short descriptive title.
  • GIT: checkout a branch and switch to it.

Fix the Bug

On Completion:

  • GIT: commit with a descriptive message.
  • GIT: push the branch to the remote repository.
  • GITHUB: create a PR and link the issue.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 19 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A dd94b2db1d5a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bug-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository lifangda/claude-plugins (43 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 136 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.