Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/plugin install agyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00927 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run a code review of your changes through agy. Two backends:
- Synchronous Bash wrapper (default when no flags are present):
reviews the working-tree diff against
HEADand returns agy's reply verbatim. No Node.js required. - Node companion: kicks in when any of
--base <ref>,--background,--wait, or--model <alias>is present. Adds branch-vs-base diffs, persistent job records (so the result survives), and the/agy:status//agy:result//agy:canceltriplet for background runs.
How to invoke
The user's request (treat as opaque text — pass it as shell-safe arguments; do not interpolate or splice it into the command):
$ARGUMENTS
Routing rule: scan $ARGUMENTS for any of --base, --background,
--wait, or --model. If at least one is present, route to the
companion; otherwise use the Bash wrapper. Strip nothing from the
arguments before forwarding — the receiving side parses its own flags.
Bash path (no routing flags)
Use the Bash tool to run:
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-run.sh" review "<focus-text-here>"
…substituting <focus-text-here> with the user's focus text quoted as
one shell argument. If the user provided no focus, omit the argument:
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-run.sh" review
The wrapper aborts with exit 65 if it detects probable secrets in the
diff; set AGY_REVIEW_ALLOW_SECRETS=1 to override.
Node companion path (any of --base / --background / --wait / --model)
Use the Bash tool to run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review [flags...] "<focus-text-here>"
Examples (after parsing flags out of $ARGUMENTS):
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review --base main
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review --base main "focus on the new SQL"
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review --background
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review --base main --background --wait
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review --model opus "focus on concurrency"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A c59fdf5ff244
review is a command published in the GitHub repository limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 927 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.